I am quite sure that old rules only apply if you entered UK on this route before 6th april 2014

for any one employee working more than 30 hours per week will not count for job creation.

but under old rules a 30 hours by one and 20 hours by the other will count. as 50 hours and need 3120 hours in total. that is my understanding .

Mind my language ? All I've seen is abuses from you. Anyhow I was trying to be smart or anything . Was just giving correct advice to someone who asked for it

Trying to hoodwink HO is not correct. The intention of this visa is to set up own business and if working as an IT contractor whichever way shown in my opinion is wrong and not legal. If you get caught its trouble.

Yes you do need to pass test for all ilr applications

Haha this is brilliant ..Please see below point 14 from the latest entrepreneur visa guidance. It is in simple English. So hopefully this should settle it.cannot be clearer Aman if you apply within 28 days as per your suggestion you have just found a third reason in addition to the two mentioned ear...

28 days is only for ILR

You obviously did not read my post... If you apply earlier than 3 years then you get your extension for another 2 so you will have to apply another extension before ILR so to do it before 3 years is stupidity. And yes you will get rejected if you apply next week not because you applied early but bec...

What nonsense you can apply anytime during your 3 year and 4 months as long as you've invested the money and done the jobs bit . Since you are given only a two year extension best to apply just after 3 years so that you do not need to apply for a second extension before ILR. I did exactly that....

Hi Rahul-

My case is very similar to yours. Would you mind sharing your solicitor details.

Many thanks

please see below HO guidance for caseworkers ..... You may ask the applicant to demonstrate that the funds they have used to apply under this category are still available to them beyond the date of their application. The funds must continue to be available to them until they are spent for the purpos...

It doesnt matter who owns what share ....why would any third party invest without getting shares?

what required is a total of 200k invested in the company (whoever owns the shares) that the applicant is a director in and access to that money