Are you serious? Which part of 'issued' is ambiguous?

The next step is when the passport arrives, check the spelling, type of visa, start/expiry dates, blah blah blah.

Another drafting error, this one is even *worse*. It is in E-LTRP 1.11 which purports to specify the circumstances under which a fiance can regularise and join the 5 year route. Except that it leaves no lawful route to regularise. A paradox results. They are not going to correct this on the grounds ...

So what are the rules then transpondia? They changed them, and I am collating the stuff from the Annex and the Appendix into an article; please give me a few days. But for starters, same address for 2 years and shared remittances for the same period. I can't think of any UP who can qualify under th...

That is more or less our intention (and it's my girlfriend haha.) but I'm concerned that it would look like a sham marriage because she would not be taking my surname and we probably wouldn't tell many people (if anyone at all). One bright spot from this thread has emerged: your pointing out the mi...

Thanks. Taking a look at it now! Take careful note! Under the current framework, the Singh route *may* close forever on 16 Oct 2012. *FOREVER*. Unless something is done to legislate it back or to secure it vis-a-vis derivative rights and related judgements from the ECJ/ECHR between now and then. Th...

Since the wife came on a dependent VISA in the UK and already lived over 2 years. Once given on FLR, she automatically meets the minimum 2 years criteria. If the two years criteria is not met she also meets the NEW 5 years criteria. Thanks, I understood the wife can settle under Paragraph 319E, but...

harv wrote:

NPKILRApp wrote:

wormintrude wrote:Thanks. Taking a look at it now!

- You apply for your ILR and at the same time get an FLR for your wife
- Once your wife got an FLR you can apply for her ILR straight away subject to the English language criteria

Question. On which basis would the wife qualify for ILR straight-away?

Transpondia - the page where the two year rule is neglected is here... http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/visas-immigration/partners-families/citizens-settled/spouse-cp/can-you-apply/ I have examined the page. I can agree that, consistent with your observations, it does not mention cohabitation requ...

I agree that you should not provide false information but you didn't give me any additional information at all. I was more than aware that the 2 year requirement still existed in the 'immigration rules' section but is neglected to be mentioned on the 'can you apply' partners page so I was bringing ...

The section listed as E-ECP 2.1 in Appendix FM of the 'guidance' contains a drafting error which has been acknowledged as incorrect. The applicant's partner can also be accompanying rather than solely settled. This has been omitted and lots of applicants will relying upon this provision. There are n...

try this https://www.google.co.uk/search?sourcei ... &q=eun2.14

patience7 wrote:Anyone please???

This thread has been overrun by those inclined to insult or issue some other form of whack; and at least I for one have retreated, it's probably best to start your own top level thread.

Based upon what you wrote, you strategy marginally improves upon using the Singh loophole, so you might as well weigh up that alternative also. For example the chances of a successful application under Singh are near 100% plus the reduced fees and so on. Only you can decide if it's right, but minima...

In some disagreement with your attorney and at least partially in disagreement with 'Casa's' post above. While evidence of a job offer can be submitted, it is not the only piece of evidence required for this situation. A confirmed job offer is the *SECOND* piece of evidence in a two-part submission....

The only apparent thing you could be missing is the fact that WorldBridge is a pathetic mockery of a help line service. Everybody knows it. This is generally common knowledge, but as you have only started recently, you may have missed it. Now you know. Otherwise it looks like you're pretty much up-t...

Most of your questions are answered in the document milieu surrounding the changes in the rules, BUT to your question about unfavorable exchange rates, which I take to include the broader sense of inequivalent economies... The answer is no. They do not, and will not, introduce multipliers that compe...

The explanatory memorandum to the Statement of Changes in the Immigration Rules HC 514 was published this morning, it's at http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitecontent/documents/news/memo-immigration-rules.pdf Note that this has to do with students and not with all the recent hubbub over family mig...

Is that means outstanding article 8 application before 9 July they can still be granted DLR after 9 July ? can somebody correct me if I'm wrong !! please. It seems people are stuggling with two different things. When the appeal itself was allowed, and secondarily when the grounds for appeal were al...

The above provisions come into effect on 9 July. So far as the maintenance requirement goes, there are protective transitional provisions that apply to those within the family migration system before 9 July 2012, there remain however classes of migrant who are outside the scope of transitional prot...

I'm not really trying to imply anything, but rather stating it outright. It's been published and was debated in the Commons earlier this week. For your question about why the Home Office did what it did in your case, I do not know and suggest that nobody else on the net does either. Perhaps the corr...

This gives the impression, to me at least and I stand to be corrected, that DL application on the basis of Article 8 will not be assessed according to the current DL policy after 09-Jul-12 even if such an application is submitted before 09-Jul, but will be subject to the new policy. This is confirm...

Amendments to the Crime and Courts Bill which affect Family Visitors were just laid about an hour ago...

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/p ... 04-via.htm

This will, presumably, slow things down a bit...

They announced a change of plan yesterday: Deps of fast-track T1's will NOT be accelerated. Now agreed to be an oversight. There may yet be another Statement of Changes, but it will NOT correct this oversight.

A document dated 13 June, but only recently visible, is entitled... IMMIGRATION RULES ON FAMILY AND PRIVATE LIFE (HC 194) GROUNDS OF COMPATIBILITY WITH ARTICLE 8 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS This document purports to explain the rationale for asserting that the immigration rules are co...

UKBA's link to the SI on their http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitecontent/newsarticles/2012/june/25-family-visit-visa-appeal page is currently broken The SI itself is at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/1532/contents/made It's being tracked here http://www.londonelegance.com/transpondia/co...