- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
Hi lmshzd,Imshzd wrote:If you are not eligible for PR then new RC application is best option for you.
Simply apply EEA2 and sent all last five years treaty rights and prove of residence.*may* be you will get PR instead of RC.
But your EEA national wife must be a qualified person at the time of your new application.does not matter a length of current job.
behold2014 wrote:Hi lmshzd,Imshzd wrote:If you are not eligible for PR then new RC application is best option for you.
Simply apply EEA2 and sent all last five years treaty rights and prove of residence.*may* be you will get PR instead of RC.
But your EEA national wife must be a qualified person at the time of your new application.does not matter a length of current job.
y do u always say this....do u know of any1 it happens too.
i can quote 3 post you av said this
I think if you attach a letter from EEA nationals employer in which employer can confirm this that EEA national is working for his/her company at the moment and this job is on going,then this will be much more better then the offer letter.John1208 wrote:Thanks Imshzd.
I just wanted to confirm whether the following documents for EEA2 would be sufficient,
1. My EEA nationals Registration Certificate that was issued Sep 2008.
2. Last 3 months payslip + bank statements
3. current employment offer letter.
PLUS
the same information for non-EEA national as stated above.
do you think that this is sufficient.?
Today I spoke with HO and explained my current situation and said that I would like to apply for EEA2 with my EEA national being employed as part-time. And they said that it is not sufficient enough as part-time..
EEA national should be on a full-time employment at the time of applying EEA2.
1:no.kulla wrote:Hello John, Imshzd and Behold,
I would appreciate your views on similar situation of mine:
I have residence card (eea2). Married for 5 years (March 2009) to eea happily married. We got a baby now (british). Unfortunately my spouse had to stop working as looking after our baby in February 2014 (she recd EEA3 -PR last month).I applied for EEA4 recently.
Questions:
1- Am I 1 month short of my wife exercising treaty?
2- Does PR make any positive on my application?
3- Do I loose my legal right to work if I get refusal?
4- Can i apply for EEA2 again? if wife not exercising treaty rights?
5- She was working without break since 2004. Can she apply for British Citizenship?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Kind regards,
Kulla
kulla wrote:Thanks Imshzd,
1-I am only worried because one solicitor mentioned, I may get refusal because wife is not exercising treaty rights till 5th year.His calculation was if we got married in March 2009 she is one month short as last payslip is February 2014. Also he said ' Her PR is not considered while making a decision as it depends on EEA exercising treaty?'
Your solicitor is not aware of EU regulations.
2- Would it matter if she is not working now ? (for British Citizenship) Technically she acquired PR in 2009 as she worked since 2004 and continued till passed February 2014.
Work Does not matter after PR.
3- As a family member of EEA with PR can I continue to work? ( Does it mention anywhere on homeoffice website)
This is common sense.non EEA nationals right derives from EEA nationals.So after EEA nationals PR,EEA national is free from all restrictions,and if you already spend 5 years under EU regulations then you are automatically acquired PR status.EEA 4 is just a application for the confirmation of your rights.
Thanks in advance.
Kind regards,
Kulla
John1208 wrote:Imshzd
You earlier said that not to send previous treaty rights information's.
Does it mean that, not to show the previous P60 slips and only show the current payslips...
Does it also mean that she needs to apply for a new EEA1 registration certificate ? or the existing one is sufficient enough.