- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
The guidance discusses what things they are interested in when contact HMRC, suggest you read it.William Blake wrote:So from what I have read are we saying that if someone goes to apply for a visa, say an indefinite leave visa, that the Home Office is going to check whether they have conformed to the conditions of their stay before granting the new visa - and this check based on the NI number ?
So is it the case then - just playing this scenario through in my mind - one could submit an application, the BIA caseworker check with inland revenue as a default, sees a large salary, he/she may investigate which includes speaking to the employer and then refuse the application.
Well then if that is the case what hope is there for all the students who have broken these conditions. What can they do about that ?
Are we sure this is the reason for the new collecting of the national insurance number. Are they going to check tax contributions as a default situation or is it that they are collecting the NI numbers should someone need to be tracked down in the future ?
Take some of your own advice SYH:The guidance discusses what things they are interested in when contact HMRC, suggest you read it.
In any case, I don't see the point of hypothesizing what can you doif you broken the conditions of the visa, either they catch you or they don't so you are playing russion roulette but remember you broke the rules so there may be consquences, there is no fix for bad behaviour.
Well, SYH I did not mean to repeat my post it was a mistake. I hope there is a fix for this bad behaviour. Please don't punish me. So sorry.Why are you repeating your post?
What in the world are you talking about? Why are you quoting me? to make some unintelligible point.William Blake wrote: Take some of your own advice SYH:
Remember that on your judgement day - "no fix for bad behaviour"
No William you have me wrong. I am going by the reactions of the HO and I see very few cases work out by breaking any kind of infringement. And I am being practical, I see no point in freaking out when there is nothing to be done. In this case, it is just bite the bullet. if there was some out, I think someone would have provided it by now but there is no benefit to sugar coating it.William Blake wrote:Well, I quote you because I have read alot of your posts. There is a strong theme to them. Rule breakers deserve to be punished. Fine if that is your view you are entitled to it of course but by definition advice is "an opinion or recommendation offered as a guide to action, conduct"
That's what this site is about. Isn't it ? I mean if you do something wrong and you ask for advice would you want to hear - well you deserve what you are going to get. Well, why put things that way. You say things of that nature a lot. Check your posts on here. You will see I ain't lying.
Yes well of course I got you that's a fair point.I am going by the reactions of the HO and I see very few cases work out by breaking any kind of infringement.
Ok but the problem with the risk assessment is that they may check randomly. Otherwise, if you worked more hours than you should have, I would think you would know what might stick out as a sore thumb in an extensions such as your payslip showing the number of hours worked or making too much money.William Blake wrote:
I am not advocating deliberate violations but if it has happened one hopes to be able to move on. ... but rather somewhat like a risk assessment.
Thank you for sending me a private message, I believe it should be posted on the board.William Blake wrote:they check to see if you have paid taxes, that you are up to date.
As a default ? Or are you saying - if they check - they check that one is up to date with taxes? So what if one isn't up to date ? An individual can always sort that out with inland revenue..