- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
Thanks Naveed.Naveed02020 wrote:Faisal,
oho sorry bro I taught u said it about me truce , Any how as for as Trinity college is concern let me tell u some thing one of Guru on this forum advice me that while home office is holding my wife case due to "EMDQ" we should do it from another place and send it as additional doc to be replace with EMDQ so I decide to get Trinity college B.1 but to be on the safe side today I call home office and enquire as General not related to our application that if a person appliction is on hold due to EMDQ and he send another English language in the mean time will the home office consider that the answer was YES.
Then I told the case worker if Trinity College is acceptable I was put on hold and then the answer was YES again
So nothing to worry and this is for every one
Naveed
Hello Haji786haji786 wrote:hi dear
thats realy good idea i think first of all we need maximum number of people to join us.i have 4 friends who wants to do it.have u tried immigration board call (0344-991-9222) and speak with them.i have heard perviouly HSMP CASE(4YEARS).they took to the high court and won it.but solicter told me if u challenge it .u will definately win.we need to make a form to gather maximun number of people who are affected by this rule.
I would like to know the amount that we will need to spend on lawyers in a case like this, especially in the light of recent UKBA success.faisaltanoli wrote:Hello Haji786haji786 wrote:hi dear
thats realy good idea i think first of all we need maximum number of people to join us.i have 4 friends who wants to do it.have u tried immigration board call (0344-991-9222) and speak with them.i have heard perviouly HSMP CASE(4YEARS).they took to the high court and won it.but solicter told me if u challenge it .u will definately win.we need to make a form to gather maximun number of people who are affected by this rule.
That is good news that we have people who are now seriously thinking to challenge this rule. I am bite naive to rolling a ball in your court, but please if you can speak to them and get some quote or opnion. As you are saying they had fought the case for HSMP. I already got one quote from solicitor which you can find on previous pages, but I know him as solicitor and hence not proved his capabilities in test case like this.
Thanks
Regards
M Faisal
Dont mind to split .... don't know how many people we have though ....faisaltanoli wrote:The quote i got was 10k.
At least 20 or more participant would be fine. I think we need to start make list of the people who are willing to participate.Tier 4 wrote:Dont mind to split .... don't know how many people we have though ....faisaltanoli wrote:The quote i got was 10k.
Yea it ll be good for a kick start, with a face book pagefaisaltanoli wrote:At least 20 or more participant would be fine. I think we need to start make list of the people who are willing to participate.Tier 4 wrote:Dont mind to split .... don't know how many people we have though ....faisaltanoli wrote:The quote i got was 10k.
W Ahmed6569 wrote:Versha8042
My wife has faced similar satituion like you Versha, but realistically speaking we knew exactly what rules were in place at the time of appointment so I believe we like so many other made fool of our self although case workers of home office do make regular mistake/error yet we went on the bases of probability and assumptions rather then reality that is why we should not feel the pain as much as the applicant with a certain out come yet deprive of their right.
My suggestion to all members who are planing to Apply for FLRM from today onwards or had applied after 06-04-2014 rules please be advice as of personal experience that no matter what u do at the end u will get 2.5 years visa and will have to wait 5 years before u can apply for ILR. Please do not involved youerself the way we did rather concentrate on your current appliction with new rules.
Regards
Waqar
Check this out - Who we believehadu21 wrote:Dear Members,
I need advice about immigration case of my wife.
I was granted ILR on 14th April 2014 on 10 year Long Residence Basis. My 2 children (Born in London) have now acquired British Nationality and British Passports in July 2014.
I applied for my Wife's FLR (M) in Croydon PEO yesterday which was approved in 1 hour & visa granted.
My 2 kids and my wife were my dependents (Tier 1 General) since October 2011.
The approval letter we received at PEO croydon mentions that my wife has to wait for 2 years in order to apply for Settlement (ILR). However, I asked the caseworker that she has already been my dependent (wife) for more than two years and she replied that she can apply for ILR any-time suitable for us.
However, I know that rules have changed since 6 April 2014 which means that spouses have to wait for 5 years to get ILR.
I am really confused and dont know who to belive.
Can seniors of this forum help me understand the situation and guide me.
Regards
Tier 4 wrote:W Ahmed6569 wrote:Yes Amber & Fasial ,
when we give Reference from imigartionboard.com in regards to few LUCKY Guys got very lucky and that there application was consider under old rules and one was also granted ILR the case worker almost laugh it out by saying why on earth people spread ill fate, irresponsible ,bad quality , False what Everrrrrrrrr u call it .
Let me be very verrrrrry clear on this me and my wife discuss this issue in depth with 2 case workers in Croydon on day of our Appointment and the answer we got
" This what the case worker has to say " Any Application regardless of the category will be delt in accordance to the the rules in place at the time of the Application no mater what the case worker will only look upon them rules if he/she has even little bit of confusion he/she will get in touch for an advice and willllllllllllllllllllll only deal your case according to the rules he/she is not allowed to go Above or Below the law at any point of time .
So my Advice to MR zzee and moon way and to All who post such bad quality news of Being granted FLRM under old rules or ILR PlZZZ Stop this Bullshit or get lost from her.
Regards
Waqar AhmedCheck this out - Who we believehadu21 wrote:Dear Members,
I need advice about immigration case of my wife.
I was granted ILR on 14th April 2014 on 10 year Long Residence Basis. My 2 children (Born in London) have now acquired British Nationality and British Passports in July 2014.
I applied for my Wife's FLR (M) in Croydon PEO yesterday which was approved in 1 hour & visa granted.
My 2 kids and my wife were my dependents (Tier 1 General) since October 2011.
The approval letter we received at PEO croydon mentions that my wife has to wait for 2 years in order to apply for Settlement (ILR). However, I asked the caseworker that she has already been my dependent (wife) for more than two years and she replied that she can apply for ILR any-time suitable for us.
However, I know that rules have changed since 6 April 2014 which means that spouses have to wait for 5 years to get ILR.
I am really confused and dont know who to belive.
Can seniors of this forum help me understand the situation and guide me.
Regards
aurnoc wrote:I have acquired the contact of the immigration lawyer who also comes on TV giving advice. if anyone can call n see what way he can help. I have a terribly busy week and then PEO appointment for FLR M on 28th. Soooo depressed
expect any miracle from HO...and what could I say except Hadu's was lucky and Varsha was unlucky...game_of_luck wrote:@aurnoc..
I can understand your frustration... Now as you have already got ilr therefore try your luck as things are still crazy. We all have seen examples of people getting 2 years and in Varsha/W Ahmeds case they even tried to convince the case workers but no joy!
Good luck to you and I wish you get 2 years visa rather than 2.5 years.
But seriously this is utter nonsense that applicants are not treated as a standard rule. Is it the case worker or homeoffice's dual policy?
Plz keep us posted with the outcome of your application.
Faisal, what do you say on Hadus's case and then at the same time Varsha's disappointment! isnt it
aurnoc wrote:I have acquired the contact of the immigration lawyer who also comes on TV giving advice. if anyone can call n see what way he can help. I have a terribly busy week and then PEO appointment for FLR M on 28th. Soooo depressed