ThanksObie wrote:You are entitled to do that.
Are you currently working or meet the financial requirement.
If you are not she will have to rely on FLR(FP)
Yes i am working and fulfil the financial requirement. So which form shall i go?
Flr(m) or
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
ThanksObie wrote:You are entitled to do that.
Are you currently working or meet the financial requirement.
If you are not she will have to rely on FLR(FP)
Many thanks amberAmber wrote:If you partner is applying for ILR, then you may apply for FLR(M) asking for a decision to be made once your partner's ILR case is decided.
ThanksObie wrote:She is not a partner of a Settled person, as you have not got ILR, so she cannot apply under set FLR(M).
FLR(FP) may be your option in these circumstance, but that can no longer be varied, as your section 3C leave has expired, although a cover letter could be written to the Home Office detailing the situation of your case, and requesting they put application on hold.
Many thanks' I appreciate your time you spent for me. Many thanks.Obie wrote:I advised for FLR (FP) as that covers a wide variety of policy.
FLR ( M) that was suggested is a good idea, but in the absence of any internal policy that binds them to do that, such application can be instantly declined as invalid , as the sponsor is not settled.
The effect of that is section 3C Is lost.
In the absence of a policy that binds them to do that, I am extremely uncomfortable suggesting that, although I will not condemn such advice. It is logical.
But par 34 of the rules seem to indicate that an application has to be valid on the day it is made and not on a later date
I have searched through but unable to find a policy or guidance that will sway my view.
It was on long residency basis.Amber wrote:khawar6, were you granted leave as a PBS applicant or long residence?