Post
by remiee » Sat Jan 17, 2015 12:39 pm
Good day to everyone in this forum. I really need some advise.
Here is a brief summary of our immigration case. I entered UK illegally in Feb 2004 and met my partner August 2005 who also came in illegal. We had 4 children born in UK Nov 2006, April 2008, Feb 2010 and June 2014. We met a solicitor in 2010 who advised us to apply using FLR-O private life in 2010 with three of our Children. The application was refused and we requested for reconsideration soon after the application refused. We did not here from HO again.
In 2014 we approached another solicitor who now advised us to apply under private life using FLR-FP since our first son is now 7 years. Unfortunately the solicitor applied and made our 7 years son as the main applicant made us his dependants which were strange, but we did not query as he was OISC level 3 advisers. Again the application was refused in 2014 and for some reason HO refunded all the fees we paid about £2Kplus.
Again the solicitor recommended and wrote HO a Pre Action Protocol letter which home still maintained their decision. Our solicitor now decided to file for judicial review.
While waiting for HO response. We received a letter from CAPITA apologizing for the delay in dealing with my 2010 application request for reconsideration and asked us to fill a form for any change in circumstances. We sent the letter to our solicitor who completed the form and sent back to CAPITA.
Yesterday 16/01/2015 we received a letter from UTIAC refusing not to grant our request for JR.
Our solicitor has now recommended to request a removal notice from HO which would trigger right of appeal.
Below are the wordings.
Following consideration of the documents lodged by the applicant and the acknowledgement of service filed be the respondent.
Decision by Upper Tribunal Judge J
The application for permission is hereby refused.
Reasons:
1. The respondent was unarguably correct in considering the case for A, (A) a minor aged 7, on the basis that (i) his parent have no right to remain and (ii) the family would return together and (iii) it was clearly reasonable to expect (child) to leave the United Kingdom with his parents.
2. It is conceded that if the applicant parent claim in their own right, the claim will fail. Hence, the grounds seek to make (Child) the vehicle through whom his family (his parents and 2 younger children none of whom has right to remain in their own right) claim a right to remain in UK as (child) dependants, thereby avoiding reliance on the reasons that renders the parents claim unarguable.
3. Paragraph 34D prevents them from doing so. As a matter of law, neither (child) parents nor his siblings are his dependants and their claims (Inc child) are bound to fail.
(3a) The applicant do show cause why the applicant should not pay the respondent’s costs of the acknowledgment of service in the sum of £640 within 7 days of service of this order upon the applicant. In the event that the applicant does not respond as directed, the order for cost shall be made final pursuant of rule 10 (7) and (8) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008.
(3b) I further direct that making of such request is not, without further directions, to operate as a bar to removal of applicant from the UK.
My questions are.
1. What do you advise we should do?
2. Was our solicitor right to have applied using our 7 years old son as the main applicant?
3. Would my reconsideration for my 2010 FLR-O application still continue or will the UTIAC refusal for JR affect the pending reconsideration request pending as at last week before we received decision from UTIAC.
4. Could some help me explain what 3b and 3b means? (I included the 3a and 3b to enable me refer my question to it)
5. My children are now 8 years, 6 years, 5 years and my fourth child is now 6 months (not in all the application)
I will really appreciate any advice.