- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Thanks for your reply.Olasunkanmi wrote:@ whiteroses, you need to show your audited or unaudited account during extension and all records of investment funds and revenue are usually separated in the account.
But don't forget that you as a director cannot count your salary with investment funds, so you shouldn't have any problem differentiating it.
Few months back i had asked same question but didn't got any satisfying answers. the problem is that HO is confusing Investment with Expenses but this is not true in accounting terms. The day when you induce money in to a business either in shape of SDL of SC its called investment but HO want you to use this investment there fore they do not want you to get it back in form of salary and hence this confusion of salary being paid from investment money.whiteroses wrote:Thanks for your reply.Olasunkanmi wrote:@ whiteroses, you need to show your audited or unaudited account during extension and all records of investment funds and revenue are usually separated in the account.
But don't forget that you as a director cannot count your salary with investment funds, so you shouldn't have any problem differentiating it.
But how do you prove that the salary you are drawing is from the revenue, and not from your investment?
If I make a revenue of say 20000 and withdraw 10000 as salary, could HO still say that your withdrawal is from the 50000 that you invested? There is no way to really prove otherwise.