- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
mypatel10 wrote:Hi friends,
I got a hearing date on 30th January 2015. Dont too much worry about questions asked by them. Just prepare urself to answer or clarify your refusal reasons. Focus on ur refusal reasons (nothing else) and be ready to answer them. Mostly the barriester from you will handle the case but in very rare case the judge ask you any question. So it is basically a discussion between judge and two barriesters on the refusal reasons. But as a safe side, a day before hearing you can ask ur barriester if any chances of questions asked or not..
In my case, the judge didnt ask me any single question...!!! Bcoz, my refusal reasons were based on ups-down in the 90 days of maintenance in my bank account and fund (50K) statement was not valid. So in this case my barriester had fight our case and that's it.
I got refusal on 4th Feb. 2015.
marketing786 wrote:My application time line is as follows:
applied sep 2013
interview feb 2014
refused aug 2014
FTT november 2014
still waiting for decision
In my refusal case worker wrote a big remarks letter on our genuinity checked every of our record from HMRC companies house immigration history previous courses we registered in.
In court HO representative accepted her self that if thats the case then appeal should be sent for reconcideration.
The interviewer made a remark on our interview sheet that we used deception becaiuse after one inetrview the other candidate went to the toilet and he might have used phone about questions asked. I dont have a proof but i think they used deception.
when HO representative told that to judge the judge just grilled HO person saying that if you work for border agency doesnt allow you to accuse come ones personality when you cannot prove.
In our refusal case worker raised a point that business plan, market research missing, experiance letters missing, poor knowledge of understanding, marketing not good,
where our answer was that there were two routes investment and invested in invested route requirements are different and did produce management account contract copy business statement shows that the money came in from client which shows business in running form. we dont see a need to send a business plan and market reserach and experiance letters for such business which is already securing contract although if it was investment route we should have. But if case worker was in such a need to see our plans could have asked us to send so. Our barrister showed them policy guidence for case worker that the cae worker was compled to ask for documents if needed (Note: this doesnt cover cases applied after oct 2013).
At one more point case worker said that we did MBA and doing business in marketing and HO representative made the point that marketing and MBA are two different things. Judge informed HO person that there is no MBA completed in the world without studying marketing. HO showed my transcript that id doesnt say marketing where I told her transcript showing my 6 modules not subjects. I have studied three marketing subject in module strategic management. My dissertation was in marketing.
In marketing question I replied that i am a small business worth 50,000 where case worker suggesting me to market my business in marketing publications which i dont see as ROI. Only one advert in a well known magazine will cost me thousands. Case worker suggesting me things which are not fisible.
The judge allowed me to talk on every single point and it took me 2.5hrs to explain everything because case worker raised 245dd.
HO asked me questions about market research and business plan marketing strategy different contracts and then said thats it. She told the judge that they are very well prepared now because they came in for appeal but were not prepared at the time of application.
Appeal someup HO representative asked judge to dismiss appeal where earlier her self accepted that it should go fo re concideration.
our barrister: Appeal should be allowed.
Decision still waiting.
What do you think....?
Tier1luck wrote:Hi all specially gurus
I did attend my hearing last week of January with partner in Birmingham. actually in 2013 in ftt judge sent my case back
to home office for reconsideration and in 2014 , home office refused again (245dd) after an interview. and I appealed again and been there to attend my hearing last week of jan 2015 . but surprisingly home office representative and judge both didn't ask
even single question and our barrister covered and discussed all refusal point .
what gona happen ? any idea ?? as home office barrister and judge didn't ask any question to us or asked to our barrister .
it was like 'one way flight' from our barrister .
any clue please .. now I been waiting for 3 weeks since attend my hearing in Birmingham .
regards
babajee
dreams143 wrote:Hi,bizz..
Please share you'r hearing experience..my refusal reasons are almost same .i have hearing on 24 November...help me its grate full to u...thx