- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
Thanks Milan, appreciate it. I asked my friend to sign for it and he was bit reluctant since he is not a practicing accountant. If this is the case, can I have it signed by someone who works with me? I have few American nationals in the office well as some british and European. IS this okay? What do HO mean by professional standing? Is there a list of qualification that can vouch as a referee?milan69 wrote:1. Your referees are fine.
2. You need your ILR/PR and passports as well.
Joint Mortgage statement & Utility bill is not necessary.
I suggest you use NCS.
My bad, I had not read the specifics about two referees shouldn't be relative. Thanks for pointing out!Manka10 wrote:Dude, have you read the form before posting or selecting your referees?
read 5.1, it clearly states the 2 referees should not be related to each other.
Also read 3.7, you have to declare all road traffic offences regardless of when they happened.
Thanks Milan. Mine was in 2008!!milan69 wrote:One FPN within last 12 months will not effect application unless it's serious.
milan69 wrote:One FPN within last 12 months will not effect application unless it's serious.
by Amber » Wed May 29, 2013 5:23 pm
As long as it is a normal FPN or a court issued FPN that is not recorded on his/her criminal record it will not be considered as a non-custodial conviction and should not lead to a refusal. Disclosure of an FPN is optional.
Quite contradictory to what you said above (listing the conviction regardless of what happen!!) - I wonder what made you change your stance!Manka10 wrote:Only minor FPNs like speeding, parking etc can be omitted, all other traffic offences have to be declared
Have you declared it in any previous application? if not then just skip it since its already spent now
Thanks Milan. I spoke to HO this morning, I have been told that - had FPN been issued in past 3 years, this "may' have been ground for refusal but since this was in 2008 (ie 6+ years ago) this wont be a problem. That said, according to the chap I spoke with, I should list it and include a cover note.milan69 wrote:by Amber » Wed May 29, 2013 5:23 pm
As long as it is a normal FPN or a court issued FPN that is not recorded on his/her criminal record it will not be considered as a non-custodial conviction and should not lead to a refusal. Disclosure of an FPN is optional.
The form clearly states that speeding and parking FPNs can be omitted, When I said declare everything, I meant you can omit those FPNs. Havent changed my mind on anything. The form is asking for ALL traffic offences, so if you have declared it earlier then no harm in declaring it again else just skiprakeysh.patel wrote:Quite contradictory to what you said above (listing the conviction regardless of what happen!!) - I wonder what made you change your stance!Manka10 wrote:Only minor FPNs like speeding, parking etc can be omitted, all other traffic offences have to be declared
Have you declared it in any previous application? if not then just skip it since its already spent now
rakeysh.patel wrote:Thanks Manka. I had not previously declared it. I spoke with HO this morning and I guess it's better to be safe then be sorry! I'd go ahead and list it and will add a cover note to explain. I've now run into another prob that I wasn't aware of! HMRC messed up my PAYE last year and undercharged the tax. They are to re work my tax code for next FY to collect the dues - not sure how this affects the application. Trying to get through to HMRC as I type this. The joy!!!
Manka10 wrote:Just call up HMRC mate and ask if you owe then anything, if yes then how can you set up the payment.
Its all up to the immigrant to have everything sorted unfortunately, neither HMRC nor HO care who's fault it maybe but if the taxes aren't in line then HO will hand down a refusal even if it was HMRC that was sloppy