- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
Don13 wrote:Have a look at this link
http://www.ecademy.com/node.php?id=76320
Join the fight against injustice
http://www.hsmpforum.co.uk/
Kind Regards,
Don13
pantaiema wrote:Fighting against restrospective change of HMSP is fine, I agree that resrospective change to HSMP is unfair.
However I do not see the point comparing people like Bill Gates with HSMP extension.
People like Bill Gates do not need HSMP.
People with a lot of capital could immigrate in the UK using Investors route, so they do not HSMP.
Don13 wrote:Have a look at this link
http://www.ecademy.com/node.php?id=76320
Join the fight against injustice
http://www.hsmpforum.co.uk/
Kind Regards,
Don13
Don13 wrote:Dear Pantaiema,
The point is to consider a case of Hightly Skilled Magnate like MR Gates who would have achieved in the old rules would suffer in new rules; The changes have been made in the mid game which is unfair its deviating from the promised norms, Even person of his caliber with Huge Significant achievement would not be able to get extension and would have to face repercussions of changes made retrospectively.
Don13
pantaiema wrote:Fighting against restrospective change of HMSP is fine, I agree that resrospective change to HSMP is unfair.
However I do not see the point comparing people like Bill Gates with HSMP extension.
People like Bill Gates do not need HSMP.
People with a lot of capital could immigrate in the UK using Investors route, so they do not HSMP.
Don13 wrote:Have a look at this link
http://www.ecademy.com/node.php?id=76320
Join the fight against injustice
http://www.hsmpforum.co.uk/
Kind Regards,
Don13
pantaiema wrote:Poeple like Bill Gates is highlyunlike are going to apply to HSMP. So it is utterly irrelevant to make rule to accomodate this sort of people. Also as I mentioned before there is another route e.g investor for people with a lot of capital which is easier than HSMP.
But under the new system unskilled people might qualify for HSMP which is probably the loophole of the new system.
Let see for example:
1. MSc degree+ 35 Points
2. Earning:23 K = 20 points. A reasonable no. of taxi drivers, people working in Tesco etc could exceed this income especially if they are working two shifts e.g. 10-12 hours a day, 7 days a weeks.
3. Age: Under 29 = 20 points
4. UK experience = 5 points.
Total > 75 points Pass thereshold points
Don13 wrote:Dear Pantaiema,
The point is to consider a case of Hightly Skilled Magnate like MR Gates who would have achieved in the old rules would suffer in new rules; The changes have been made in the mid game which is unfair its deviating from the promised norms, Even person of his caliber with Huge Significant achievement would not be able to get extension and would have to face repercussions of changes made retrospectively.
Don13
pantaiema wrote:Fighting against restrospective change of HMSP is fine, I agree that resrospective change to HSMP is unfair.
However I do not see the point comparing people like Bill Gates with HSMP extension.
People like Bill Gates do not need HSMP.
People with a lot of capital could immigrate in the UK using Investors route, so they do not HSMP.
Don13 wrote:Have a look at this link
http://www.ecademy.com/node.php?id=76320
Join the fight against injustice
http://www.hsmpforum.co.uk/
Kind Regards,
Don13