- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
Dependants may benefit?sushdmehta wrote:Scope of the judgment may be restricted to just HSMP / Work Permit migrants or migrants in immigration categories where "absences from UK" was not a requirement to be met under the immigration rules specified at the time.
I will say dependant do benefit, or will benefits. It goes without saying, that if primary applicant benefits, then dependants will, mutatis mutandis.vinny wrote:Dependants may benefit?sushdmehta wrote:Scope of the judgment may be restricted to just HSMP / Work Permit migrants or migrants in immigration categories where "absences from UK" was not a requirement to be met under the immigration rules specified at the time.
Obie wrote:I will say dependant do benefit, or will benefits. It goes without saying, that if primary applicant benefits, then dependants will, mutatis mutandis.vinny wrote:Dependants may benefit?sushdmehta wrote:Scope of the judgment may be restricted to just HSMP / Work Permit migrants or migrants in immigration categories where "absences from UK" was not a requirement to be met under the immigration rules specified at the time.
However I will agree that the scenerio that ILRhopeful provided will not succeed, unless Edgehill is engaged.
Any further attempts at posting pointless remarks in threads in order to bump your PM count will result in posts being deleted and your account suspended.psc_ilr1003 wrote:waht are the next steps