- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
scorpio1 wrote:thanks for information but unfortunately, still my initial query is misunderstood.
I am not looking for any documents for sham marriage but for public security and public policy.
Thank you very much for intelligent advice.call the home office for best guidance
I think you even not know yourself that what you are asking . If frankly speaking then under UKBA eyes almost all marriages are sham if the couples belong to risky low develop countries unless they reply 100% correct during interview and/or have joint commitments like bank balance, children, mortgage, bills, family gatherings etc. And the word you using public security is totally non-related here because even sham marriage is not dangerous for public.scorpio1 wrote:thanks for information but unfortunately, still my initial query is misunderstood.
I am not looking for any documents for sham marriage but for public security and public policy.
I think, yet again, that you may not fully understand the request.UKBA HUNTER wrote:I think you even not know yourself that what you are asking . If frankly speaking then under UKBA eyes almost all marriages are sham if the couples belong to risky low develop countries unless they reply 100% correct during interview and/or have joint commitments like bank balance, children, mortgage, bills, family gatherings etc. And the word you using public security is totally non-related here because even sham marriage is not dangerous for public.scorpio1 wrote:thanks for information but unfortunately, still my initial query is misunderstood.
I am not looking for any documents for sham marriage but for public security and public policy.
I think on behalf of op now you clarified a bit further his main query which was unclear before. Probably your excessive web surfing helped here. But my fully generalized answer based on member personal experience has given a general answer. I am sure you will continue to post which directly or indirectly lead to same general answer. All the best to keep continue in posting but alonechaoclive wrote:I think, yet again, that you may not fully understand the request.UKBA HUNTER wrote:I think you even not know yourself that what you are asking . If frankly speaking then under UKBA eyes almost all marriages are sham if the couples belong to risky low develop countries unless they reply 100% correct during interview and/or have joint commitments like bank balance, children, mortgage, bills, family gatherings etc. And the word you using public security is totally non-related here because even sham marriage is not dangerous for public.scorpio1 wrote:thanks for information but unfortunately, still my initial query is misunderstood.
I am not looking for any documents for sham marriage but for public security and public policy.
The OP is specifically asking for info about how applications are assessed against the public policy, public security and public health criteria, which can allow the Embassy/Home Office to reject an application; this is referred to directly in Directive 2004/38/EC.
The OP only mentioned marriages of convenience to give an example of the documents that are already available for caseworkers to use when reaching decisions.
Haha. My web searches could hardly be considered 'excessive' as they take about 30 seconds each. I don't know where on this thread you have given a useful general answer. Answers, yes. Useful ones? I think not, as is often the case.UKBA HUNTER wrote: I think on behalf of op now you clarified a bit further his main query which was unclear before. Probably your excessive web surfing helped here. But my fully generalized answer based on member personal experience has given a general answer. I am sure you will continue to post which directly or indirectly lead to same general answer. All the best to keep continue in posting but alone
Good luck!scorpio1 wrote:Thanks all of you to share info especially chaoclive, you understood my initial query perfectly. I am in touch with EC as well, I can understand that such info is not available easily, will update you once get some new information.
thanks