- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
Yours is truly a sad story and only one in your position can understand what you are going through. However, I feel the experts in the forum has made their suggestions and we overwhelmingly feel that since the document mentioning your P60 for one particular year was not provided, neither was any document provided to substantiate that you were employed in that year, makes this a very difficult case to pursue. I believe since you are already a PR and a citizen, why does not your husband apply for british citizenship directly? I understand it would cost a bit of money, but it won't be more than what you have already paid to a solicitor. Or may be I may have missed something vital here.White Beegmail.com wrote:I am so sorry for opening a new topic as I am new in this forum. I
Hi Obie,
Thank your for your response but I am referring in legal point of view. In EEA legislation it does stating has to be P60
Quoted from Gov website:
8.3 Where the family member claims to be a child of the EEA national or an extended family member, we need evidence not only from the family member but also from the EEA national to show that they are still in the UK exercising Treaty rights, or has acquired a right of permanent residence. The evidence required for this could be in the form of bank statements, payslips or letter from an employer which meets the criteria set in paragraphs 3.3 & 3.4. This will not apply, however, where the family member has been issued with a Permanent Residence Card see paragraph 14.2.
vinny wrote:PR is also a requirement for naturalisation. Without proof or confirmation of husband's PR, they may refuse his citizenship application may on the same grounds.
However, as you have already obtained British citizenship, it follows that you must have already attained PR or was granted ILR. If you attained PR, then to continue to exercise treaty rights in the UK, it's sufficient that you and your husband must not be absent for more than two years.
It seems to me in this case that has actually been acquired. However they OP'S spouse solicitor or the OP, may have inadvertently forgot to provide a piece of document that will satisfy the decision maker that the burden of proving eligibility has been discharged.vinny wrote:PR is also a requirement for naturalisation. Without proof or confirmation of husband's PR, they may refuse his citizenship application may on the same grounds.
However, as you have already obtained British citizenship, it follows that you must have already attained PR or was granted ILR. If you attained PR, then to continue to exercise treaty rights in the UK, it's sufficient that you and your husband must not be absent for more than two years.
liquidweb wrote:I truly cannot understand why your husband cannot apply for BC as your dependent. He only needs to prove he has been with you for 3 years and fulfil what is mentioned here: https://www.gov.uk/becoming-a-british-c ... sh-citizen
White Beegmail.com wrote: Also I hold British citizen since 2008.
vinny wrote:White Beegmail.com wrote: Also I hold British citizen since 2008.