- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
On basis HO might write to company to confirm your details suggest use address of location of HR department, either head office or actual location, as appropriate. Neither would be 'wrong'.aragon wrote:Hi,
I hope someone can help me with this.
In the naturalisation FORM AN, PAGE 11, QUESTION 1.53, they ask for employer's address.
Now I checked my p60s and the employer address in that is different to my place or work and the headoffice address. I believe, it is of the payroll department's address.
Also, one of my previous employer has outsourced its payroll to another company so the p60 has address of that company.
So my question is, which address should I put down. My actual Work address, Or the Head Office Address Or the one on the P60.
Any help here is much appreciated.
Thanks for your reply. I thought the same before but then I started thinking more.noajthan wrote: On basis HO might write to company to confirm your details suggest use address of location of HR department, either head office or actual location, as appropriate. Neither would be 'wrong'.
Every business or corporation bigger than a corner store probably has multiple addresses, using 1 address over another does not constitute deception.aragon wrote:Thanks for your reply. I thought the same before but then I started thinking more.noajthan wrote: On basis HO might write to company to confirm your details suggest use address of location of HR department, either head office or actual location, as appropriate. Neither would be 'wrong'.
What if they check HMRC for records and their they will have details as per my P60s.
Has anyone got any enquiries forwarded to their employers during Naturalisation application. I have been reading this forum, but never saw a case where employer got sent any letters regarding applicants.
If you are currently unemployed, then it is not relevant. You write 'unemployed' on the form in the relevant question.Rajuk09 wrote:So what happens who have been Employed and Selft employed at the same time , and currently not working ? Will have 3 numbers ? Or as currently not working , can leave it blank ?
I don't understand on why this too topics are merged. There was a reason why I opened a new topic as it is totally different subject.sushdmehta wrote:Topic merged.
Reading carefully helps!Please create and use one topic for your queries regarding a specific topic / immigration application (e.g. - settlement, PBS, naturalisation).
See section 2, page 30 of form, it seems quite clear proof is required, (just as for every other aspect of the application).aragon wrote:Hi,
My wife and I got ILR in August, 2014. We sent our bachelors degree and point base calculator printout to prove english language requirement.
Now for the citizenship application, there is a point in An form to tick which says that I have already proved my english language during ILR.
If I tick this, does that mean, I don't need to send the degree certificate again. Or should I send the degree certificate and point base calculator again just to be on a safer side?
Thanks
Thanks for your reply.noajthan wrote:See section 2, page 30 of form, it seems quite clear proof is required, (just as for every other aspect of the application).aragon wrote:Hi,
My wife and I got ILR in August, 2014. We sent our bachelors degree and point base calculator printout to prove english language requirement.
Now for the citizenship application, there is a point in An form to tick which says that I have already proved my english language during ILR.
If I tick this, does that mean, I don't need to send the degree certificate again. Or should I send the degree certificate and point base calculator again just to be on a safer side?
Thanks
Thanks.sushdmehta wrote:If the fine was imposed by the council / authority / private contractors acting on behalf of either, then it is a PCN, not FPN.
If you wish to declare them (no harm), use page 24.