- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
Well they cannot do that. They are not the legislature or the executive who can implement policies.Wanderer wrote:Have you considered they might see it as too low and raise it?!!
True. But I believe that the government is also waiting for the judgment to see what benchmarks the Supreme Court sets for acceptable in this field and then it will raise the earnings threshold to the maximum the Supreme Court would allow. I would expect it to be timed to the traditional 6th April changes to the Immigration Rules, if the judgment is delivered in February 2016.Obie wrote:Well they cannot do that. They are not the legislature or the executive who can implement policies.
In his 6 years on the forum and 8492 posts, Wanderer will have seen toughening of the Rules that many would believed would be unthinkable. He is generally realistic and doesn't 'sugar coat' anything...although not always what some members want to read.Universal soldier wrote:Wanderer never write in favor of migrants and always have negative mentalityWanderer wrote:Have you considered they might see it as too low and raise it?!!
And the secret.Simon perhaps his new disciples who has same inflammable identical ideas.
Exactly, if I was anti-migrant I wouldn't be here! I'd have cleared off long ago as soon as my issues had been resolved, as a lot do.Casa wrote:In his 6 years on the forum and 8492 posts, Wanderer will have seen toughening of the Rules that many would believed would be unthinkable. He is generally realistic and doesn't 'sugar coat' anything...although not always what some members want to read.Universal soldier wrote:Wanderer never write in favor of migrants and always have negative mentalityWanderer wrote:Have you considered they might see it as too low and raise it?!!
And the secret.Simon perhaps his new disciples who has same inflammable identical ideas.
secret.simon is simply relaying statements made by (in this case) a Liberal MP and the National press.
They wanted to set the sponsorship rate at 26k ish, which is the poverty level cap for a couple with 1 child for the welfare payment Tax Credits. Doing this to stop a foreign national being too much of a burden to the UK taxpayers as their spouse must now support them. Instead they set it a 18.6, just above the poverty level cap for a couple only, with the welfare payment Tax Credits.secret.simon wrote: Sarah Teather, a LibDem minister in the last government, had mentioned in 2013 that the Tories wanted to increase the threshold to £40000. I doubt that they would increase it that far, but I would expect an increase to £20000 with an automatic annual increase linked to inflation.
I was brought up to bear children when you could afford them and had a stable environment to bring them up in. Perhaps I'm old fashioned. I despair of the the number of people I see having kids when in a total mess both financially and on here, without any legal status.Universal soldier wrote:@wanderer
You seems like an expert who surf several chatting websites or run your own chatting website. By ignoring all of what you said do you know how many genuine couples having kids are suffering because that inhuman requirement causing distances between beloved ones. Unmarried partnership must totally be abolished which causing such scam which you said but a genuine couple need to marry either abroad or if anyone of them UK visa national then have to have visa to come to marry. As I said earlier that £18600 threshold already having £3000 in excess inside and any new increase would open door of several legal çhallenges. Usually those ones who are free from such hassles can never understand it.
+1Wanderer wrote:...
I was brought up to bear children when you could afford them and had a stable environment to bring them up in. Perhaps I'm old fashioned. I despair of the the number of people I see having kids when in a total mess both financially and on here, without any legal status.
I don't have any chat sites and only have Facebook for anything remotely similar, I'm too busy with my businesses, proactively earning money instead of bleating about the lack of it. I was brought up in a house with five of us in one room, so I've not had a privileged upbringing. I'm a committed Socialist but to me that doesn't mean sitting on your arse waiting for the benefits to arrive....
...
Anyway, i've been around long enough to remember when UK visas were all free........
Mud can make you prisoner, and the plains can bake you dry
Snow can burn your eyes, but only people make you cry
Home is made for coming from, for dreams of going to
+1noajthan wrote:+1Wanderer wrote:...
I was brought up to bear children when you could afford them and had a stable environment to bring them up in. Perhaps I'm old fashioned. I despair of the the number of people I see having kids when in a total mess both financially and on here, without any legal status.
...
Mud can make you prisoner, and the plains can bake you dry
Snow can burn your eyes, but only people make you cry
Home is made for coming from, for dreams of going to
Not quite correct.Universal soldier wrote:secret.Simon perhaps his new disciples who has same inflammable identical ideas
I believe the government's view is that in exercise of your right to a family life, you can stay with your non-EEA spouse in his/her non-EEA country.mkhan2525 wrote:I don't think a fair balance has be struck between Article 8 and the income threshold.
No, but I can hazard a guess.Universal soldier wrote:Do you know that the purpose of £18600 threshold.