adedayoh wrote:She has the same right as you but proving those rights will be difficult.
Overall, I'd agree the statement.
Here is the guidance issued by Home Office: <An employer’s guide to right to work checks> and
check Page 24 of
Lists of acceptable documents for right to work checks https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... _final.pdf
In Page 24, before an non-EEA of EEA family member receives RC or PR or other sort of .., we basically fall into Group 2.
EEA Family Permit is not listed here. So according to Home Office, it does not directly
confirm one's right to work. So in practice, as I see many cases in this forum, it indeed depends on your prospective employer.
In the meantime, check Group2,point 3. If prospective employer uses Home Office Employer Checking Service and get a Positive Verification Notice issued by HO, it confirms one's right to work. Often if one holds or held an EEA FP, and is in the process of RC application, before being issued a COA, employer's check is likely to get positive result. And thus , it helps to fill in the time gap.
As shown in capetonian case, he/she applied RC 1/10/2015, then his/her EEA FP expired 18/10/2015 but he/she is already in the process of RC application. His/her employer did the check and gets the positive result.