- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
I dont see what difference it made and why they had to know what the purpose is.sumne wrote:Hi,
I am planning to apply for HSMP this/next week. Today I went to collect the letter from my employer stating my gross and net income for last 12 months. Since they didnt agree with the format I gave, I thought of getting 12 salary slips attested from the employer. They agreed to attest all salary slips, but on one condition. They want to know the reason why I want such a letter and they would write the same reason upon each salary slip saying this is for such specific reason. Since I couldnt tell them that I am applying for HSMP, I told I need this for housing loan purpose. Now they have attested all the salary slips, but with the reason upon each salary slips.
My question is,
1. will HSMP body agree to such a letter which is attested by employer but a wrong reason written on it?
2. Can I give 12 attested salary slips in case I cannot get a letter stating my last 12 months net and gross salary was this much?
Thanks for your response in advance,
sumne
Tibu wrote:From my office also same thing is happening, they have
written like
"for Housing loan" on the Wage slip.
I guss this is not a problem since my friend also did the same way and got HSMP approved. i am also trying out my luck..... lets wait and see...
It is consecutive, (you can miss a month if you want but it has to be within 12 month period.) it is clearly listed in the guidance and common knowledge on the forum. You probably had enough based within 12 month periodPaulhsmp wrote:Hello SYH,
I think it is you, who have to get more clarification on this. The 12 months need not be consecutive. I can tell this 100% because I have got HSMP approval in April 2007. My 12 months were not consecutive.
Also can you please show anywhere in the HSMP guidelines saying that the months has to be consecutive.
It is always better to keep all the information in a browse-able format instead of keep giving same clarifications and same replies to hundreds of people.
No offence meant.
Regards
Paul
http://ec-hsmp.blogspot.com
28. We will assess your gross earnings before tax over a total period of up to 12 months out of the 15 months immediately prior to your application. The earnings can be for any consecutive 12-month period out of the last 15 months. There can be gaps in employment within this 12 month period. However, the cumulative earnings total will still need to meet the earnings threshold claimed against. This applies if you are in salaried or non-salaried employment. You should indicate the start and end date of the period claimed on the application form. If you claim for a period exceeding/outside the 12 months out of a 15-month period prior to the application date, we will assess the 12 months directly prior to the application date.
SYH wrote:Paulhsmp wrote:Hello SYH,
It is consecutive, (you can miss a month if you want but it has to be within 12 month period.) it is clearly listed in the guidance and common knowledge on the forum. You probably had enough based within 12 month period
Paulhsmp wrote:NO. It is not.
It can be any 12 months out of previous 15 months.
I am repeating once again...
Can you please show anywhere in the HSMP guidelines saying that the months has to be consecutive. Or atleast can you show it in any of the Home office websites FAQs.
You will not be able to do this because you are wrong.
Paul
http://ec-hsmp.blogspot.com
Paulhsmp wrote:Hello SYH,
It is consecutive, (you can miss a month if you want but it has to be within 12 month period.) it is clearly listed in the guidance and common knowledge on the forum. You probably had enough based within 12 month period
You are telling this in such a way that I have requested you for some service and you are not ready to do this for me.SYH wrote:Paul I am not going to find it for you.
This is not a justification for your point. But I don't mind waiting for response from others. Whatever they say I am 100% sure about my points.SYH wrote:Other people on the forum will come on to tell you the same thing. the 12 months must be consecutive. And gordon just posted it anyway
I just find suspicious your need to self proclaim yourself as some kind of authority on the matter. When there others like victoria and avjones who clearly would be more trustworthyPaulhsmp wrote:You only came up with some 'Mistake' in my blog.
You should be having some point to justify your statement.
Because I know the rules
I have 100% justification for what I am saying because I am telling this from my own experience. You just got luckyYou are telling this in such a way that I have requested you for some service and you are not ready to do this for me. I am not going to find something that is practical common knowledgeSYH wrote:Paul I am not going to find it for you.This is not a justification for your point. But I don't mind waiting for response from others. Whatever they say I am 100% sure about my points. Go look at Gordon's post. You are wrong.SYH wrote:Other people on the forum will come on to tell you the same thing. the 12 months must be consecutive. And gordon just posted it anyway
Also please don't take this as offensive... Please read the HSMP guidelines atleast once before you start guiding others. Umm I read the guidelines, have you. You dont know what I read so don't assume it, buddy
good point gordon.gordon wrote:But Paul, that may have been your experience, but that's no longer relevant ! The guidance notes have been revised since you applied for initial approval, and if you want your blog to be helpful to other people, it should reflect those changes. Please see my post from 5.03pm; I am sure that you would not want to mislead potential applicants in what you advise in your blog. AG
You dont have to remove the other posts.Paulhsmp wrote:Hello SYH and all others,
I admit my mistake.
I saw gordon's reply (5.03) only now.
Sorry. I was referring to the old guidelines document.
I will go through the new guidelines note.
Also I am ready to remove my posts, whereever I said against SYH.
But my intention was to help others.
I am from India. The agents here is asking for 50,000 INR for the support for HSMP, which is really a big amount for a common person in India. I thought of doing a bit of help. I am not an agent or consultant of HSMP. Also I have not yet taken a single penny from anyone with regard to HSMP.
Apologies...
Paul.