- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
Correct yes.John Green wrote:Thanks again. One statement dated under 28 days from the date of application and that covers the whole 6 months period, and that it stamped by the bank, etc. is sufficient.
NoDoes she have to also show UKVI her bank statement, indicating the money she has in her name in a bank over there? Perhaps contained in an official statement from her bank covering the same 6 months period?
Yes, only you need to meet the financial requirement and show evidence of it.Or is it only my money here in the UK they are interested in knowing about (ie for the "cash savings" requirement)?
You've definitely got that wrong! By a long way!John Green wrote:Cheers.
I gather that a spousal visa is officially known as a Tier 1 (General) visa? Where I support her for 5 years and she has no job to come to the UK to do. Where her only "asset" is that she is married to me.
John Green wrote:Okay, I just added something else to the post thanks.
"So the situation is this. The visa she receives in her country when she applies for the "join a family member" visa is only valid for 30 days. So when she receives the visa in the post, she has only 30 days in which to use it (ie to come to the UK)? (A UK visitor visa can be used at any time within the 6 months it is valid.). Visitor visas and settlement (spouse) visas are TWO DIFFERENT things, not related in anyway. Forget about the visitor visa, it is not relevant to the spouse visa.
During this 30 days period she has, she needs to get the BRP card within 10 days of her arriving to the UK. Where does she get it from? Presumably, this card would have to be issued quickly, to meet the 10 days criterion." From a Post Office that she has to nominate in her application form.
Is this not JG's thread?Casa wrote:It's considered rude to high jack another member's thread and it also becomes confusing. Please post this in your own thread.
It is indeed...and it looks like another mod split the other member's post into their own thread, while I was posting. Now you see it...now you don'tWanderer wrote:Is this not JG's thread?Casa wrote:It's considered rude to high jack another member's thread and it also becomes confusing. Please post this in your own thread.
And there was I think a mod's only duties are to lock posts that don't agree with their personal viewsCasa wrote:It is indeed...and it looks like another mod split the other member's post into their own thread, while I was posting. Now you see it...now you don'tWanderer wrote:Is this not JG's thread?Casa wrote:It's considered rude to high jack another member's thread and it also becomes confusing. Please post this in your own thread.
Ahhh, that would have been me..............Guilty as charged Your HonourCasa wrote:It is indeed...and it looks like another mod split the other member's post into their own thread, while I was posting. Now you see it...now you don'tWanderer wrote:Is this not JG's thread?Casa wrote:It's considered rude to high jack another member's thread and it also becomes confusing. Please post this in your own thread.