After the fun and games on the 23rd of this month, what could happen the morning after?
If the UK votes to Leave,
does the Prime Minister have to trigger Brexit talks under Article 50? This analysis suggests that it is not a legal necessity, but a political one. As the article says "These conclusions are founded not on law, but on the interaction of the rules with the politics. That means they are not certain: the politics could always play in unexpected ways."
Another analysis on another blog looks at whether
the UK can exit the EU overnight (well, they outline a plan for exiting the EU within one week), while completely short-circuiting the Article 50 process. That approach is purely legalistic and does not take into account the fury and sanctions that the UK will face from the EU by doing that. But, given that Article 50 is disadvantageous to the leaving country (the UK), in for a penny, in for a pound...
And lawyers are beavering away in
Brussels to trigger Article 50, if the UK does not do so, as some Leave campaigners have suggested. Apparently, "options include stretching the meaning of a “notification” and potentially threatening to suspend Britain’s rights in the
single market."
I also recommend this week's Economist (out now) for its take on Brexit. It may be worth buying it at the stand if it is not available in your local library. PS: I don't work for the Economist, or indeed any of the publications that I link to.
And finally, if you can't tell the European Union from the Council of Europe or the difference between the EEA, the EU and the Schengen Zone, here is a simple
Euler diagram from Wikipedia that simplifies things.
I am not a lawyer or immigration advisor. My statements/comments do not constitute legal advice. E&OE. Please do not PM me for advice.