- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
How is that genuine ?? It is a desperate attempt to stay here I would say.Considering the PRE april 2014 transitional arrangements.
1. Would he satisfy the requirement for extension by employing 13 employees just for this last 2 months before his visa expiry. (equivalent of 2 jobs)
2. Also would he satisfy the requirement for accelerated ILR if he is ready to employ 63 people full time for this last 2 months before his visa expiry. (equivalent of 10 jobs)
The requirement of hiring that many employees at this stage is totally genuine though.
I understand your point. But businesses work that way. Every new venture is different and may need investments/jobs etc.. at varying stages. The job requirements i mentioned above can be justified with a large order or expansion for instance.zimba88 wrote:How is that genuine ?? It is a desperate attempt to stay here I would say.Considering the PRE april 2014 transitional arrangements.
1. Would he satisfy the requirement for extension by employing 13 employees just for this last 2 months before his visa expiry. (equivalent of 2 jobs)
2. Also would he satisfy the requirement for accelerated ILR if he is ready to employ 63 people full time for this last 2 months before his visa expiry. (equivalent of 10 jobs)
The requirement of hiring that many employees at this stage is totally genuine though.
How do you hire 63 or even 13 full time people in a short period ??? Why a business needs that many employees in a short period of time and right before visa expiry ?? Coincidence ??
Totally agree it does sound that way. But 13 employees requirement due to a large project sign up doens't sound that remote to me. Especially after years of hard work to achieve this outcome. I guess the question really is about the rules :Business2business wrote:This is joke
I understand, for pre april 2014 applications, the aggregate is hours will do. But would like get your thoughts on 6 workers for 4 months each for eg or further down like 8 workers for 4 months each ?Pre 6 April 2014 transitional arrangement
165. If you successfully applied to enter the route before 6 April 2014, you may continue to
employ:
one worker for 24 months
one worker for 6 months and one for 18 months
4 workers for 6 months each
rsrameshsunil wrote:Totally agree it does sound that way. But 13 employees requirement due to a large project sign up doens't sound that remote to me. Especially after years of hard work to achieve this outcome. I guess the question really is about the rules :Business2business wrote:This is joke
I understand, for pre april 2014 applications, the aggregate hours will do. But would like get your thoughts on 6 workers for 4 months each for eg or further down like 8 workers for 4 months each ?Pre 6 April 2014 transitional arrangement
165. If you successfully applied to enter the route before 6 April 2014, you may continue to
employ:
one worker for 24 months
one worker for 6 months and one for 18 months
4 workers for 6 months each
There have been at least two recent cases on this forum that I recall that people came here -on the last day- (one was fantasizing on some last minute crazy idea of asking others to consider their employees for her/his case....)dd156 wrote:Wow, is someone really in this situation? He really left all this to the last minute?