- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Appreciate the fact that UKVI has not refused the application outright (would have lost ILR fee anyway) but is ready to extend her stay, as is usually the practice when applicant fails the KoLL requirement, provided you pay the IHS (had she been refused, you would have had to pay for FLR(M) and IHS fee too)!E-ILRP.1.6. wrote:The applicant must have demonstrated sufficient knowledge of the English language and sufficient knowledge about life in the United Kingdom in accordance with the requirements of Appendix KoLL of these Rules.
You were evidently misadvised at the get-go before applying. HO are just applying their current rules, which are in the public domain.DavidSWP74 wrote:Before applying for ILR she noticed that the certificate was no-longer in the list of acceptable qualifications and spoke to an immigration solicitor who said that it would be ok if a supporting letter from the college was sent with the ILR application. We paid for this advice, but unfortunately don't have it in writing
Immigration is now cost-neutral to the UK tax payer, hence the increased costs. You should be pointing your finger at the abusers, tax-fiddlers and health tourists, etc. It wasn't that long ago the immigration process was completely free. I remember that.DavidSWP74 wrote:Thanks for the advice. But I can't contain my loathing for the home-office. You pay £1500 for something that obviously doesn't cost that to administer (or if it does someone is skimming off the profits). £2000 cost to my family. £2000 from my child's inheritance, £2000 pounds that could be given to good causes. Bunch of facing assholes.