- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Can a child ever be a qualified person? What did the Chen ruling state?noajthan wrote:Glad to hear all that wild talk of overstay has been put to bed.
No idea how much CSI would cost for a child but getting some in place would surely make daughter's position as a qualified person unassailable.
Once she has her id she could then shoot for RC.
This is old, November 2013, and the rules may have changed (?) but it saysnoajthan wrote:Glad to hear all that wild talk of overstay has been put to bed.
No idea how much CSI would cost for a child but getting some in place would surely make daughter's position as a qualified person unassailable.
Once she has her id she could then shoot for RC.
Your analysis appears correct, she may not now have time to acquire PR before UK cuts itself adrift.
So possession of some EU documentation may prove its worth if any transitional arrangements are going to be put in place.
Interestingly, there is no age limit specified for being a qualified person.Petaltop wrote:Can a child ever be a qualified person? What did the Chen ruling state?noajthan wrote:Glad to hear all that wild talk of overstay has been put to bed.
No idea how much CSI would cost for a child but getting some in place would surely make daughter's position as a qualified person unassailable.
Once she has her id she could then shoot for RC.
CSI is a form of insurance so no it can't be backdated. (It was first suggested back in April).ToonBarmy wrote:Hi
We would like to gain the CSI just as a safeguard, as you say it certainly cannot do any harm and may yet prove essential despite what we have previously been told, i assume this cannot be back dated and so the 3 years already here, in essence would be "lost" and day 1 of the qualifying period is from when the EU national has in place the CSI ?. My stepdaughter is registered with the Swiss embassy here in London and as stated she should soon be in possession of a Swiss National Identity card, we may also have a way forward in terms of obtaining a child arrangement order from here in the U.K (custody).
In terms of the CSI, i have looked into website that offer quotes to EEA nationals seeking CSI however they all only quote for adults aged 18+, does anyone know of other cases where this has been sought / gained for minors ?, any idea of the likely range of costs for CSI for a minor?
Many thanks
According to an earlier post (perhaps not here), the OP had been led to believe that EU citizens could freely live in the UK. What's more, one can probably still find people who say that Immigration Rule 5 prohibits her from lawfully receiving a valid settlement visa.Petaltop wrote:Why didn't you, the British citizen, just sponsor your step-daughter under UK immigration rules to get her to the UK from Thailand?
Rule 5 wrote:Save where expressly indicated, these Rules do not apply to those persons who are entitled to enter or remain in the United Kingdom by virtue of the provisions of the 2006 EEA Regulations. But any person who is not entitled to rely on the provisions of those Regulations is covered by these Rules.
ToonBarmy wrote:Hi All
I am a newbie on here and would just like to start by thanking anyone who reads and / or replies to my post. Last week we got the bad news that my Stepdaughters British Citizenship application has been refused. She is a 7 year old child, has duel Swiss / Thai nationality, she acquired her Swiss passport via her Swiss biological father with whom she has no contact, her Thai mum (my wife) has gone through the Settlement Visa, ILR and British Citizenship steps already and thus is now British.
We applied under section 3(1) at the Home Secretary's discretion but this was refused as they do not classify her as being "settled" here under the immigration laws. They (HO) state that as the minor of an EEA national she cannot be settled here until either she has ILR or has acquired Permanent Residence under European law. She has been living here very happily and attending school for the past 2+ years now and is very much "British" with a stronger local accent even than myself.
We brought her here to the U.K on Dec 29th 2013 and she entered the U.K on her Swiss passport gained as stated via her biological Fathers Country of origin, this passport was applied for and granted via the Swiss Embassy, Bangkok, Thailand.
This was just prior to my wife applying for and being successful in acquiring ILR which in turn became Citizenship last October 2015 (so Mum is now a British Citizen and Passport holder). The whereabouts of "Dad" are unknown and he plays no part in his daughters life, this was explained within the application and this did not form any part of the refusal. As my stepdaughter traveled upon her Swiss passport and entered the U.K on this passport so no visa was applied for in Thailand, her stay here in the U.K is lawful and she does not require a visa to be here, I have checked with the HO and explained all the facts, I have been told she is here as an EEA / Swiss person, is counted as a "qualified person" and has the right of abode.
For her to apply for ILR now whilst this can only be applied for from within the U.K as I understand things because she does not have a visa so she cannot actually apply for ILR now ?, she I believe would need to either return to Thailand and start the whole visa process from there or apply for discretionary FLR from within the U.K, however this route as I understand it could only be taken on her Thai passport but not on her Swiss passport (which is how she entered the U.K). Her Thai passport will soon expire and she has no prospect of gaining a new one without either her biological fathers consent or my wife having sole custody, both of which points we are stuck on as detailed below, the Thai consulate have confirmed there is no exception or discretion with regards to this in terms of them issuing a new passport once the current one expires, no Thai passport = no FLR / ILR as I understand things.
And so for her to qualify under the EEA Permanent Residence requirements she needs to have been living here for 5 years, however her 5 years will not be complete until Dec 29th 2018 (5 years to the day she arrived), still relatively straightforward right ?, however this is complicated by the fact that her Swiss passport will expire on Dec 2nd 2018 - around 4 weeks short of her 5 years residency period and we basically have no chance to renew this or obtain a new Swiss passport as under Swiss law it can only be issued with either her biological fathers signature / permission, his whereabouts are unknown and he plays no part in his daughters life now and so obtaining his signature for a new Swiss passport is seemingly impossible (even if he could be traced it is very very unlikely he would consent to sign), the other way would be if my wife had sole custody, however her Swiss Court divorce decree gave no custody provisions as the divorce was applied for and undertaken by my wife but in her absence which apparently is very rare in Switzerland - her circumstances were quite unique. So whilst the Swiss were aware of the child they made no provision thus it is joint custody by default, the Thai Courts will not issue custody as it was not set aside within the original Swiss divorce decree and the Thai Court state the custody provisions must be made within this, also now that my stepdaughter lives here in the U.K so it now falls outside of there jurisdiction anyway as in Thai law she must be living within Thailand for them to even entertain such a case. I have then contacted a U.K lawyer and looked into obtaining a "Child Arrangement Order" via the U.K family Courts (U.K equivalent of custody) however the lawyer confirmed that as the position was there was no dispute that my stepdaughter lives with her mum, as the child's father was not on the scene and not contesting anything so they will not issue any Child Arrangement Order. So 3 Countries none of whom we can obtain custody from, no custody, no consent from my stepdaughters father = no new Swiss passport, again whilst the Swiss Embassy have been very sympathetic and helpful it has been made clear there is no discretion or loophole, no way around this.
So applying under the 5 years EEA residence rules seems impossible, as the HO letter states she would need to first acquire Permanent Residence under European law to later be able to gain British Citizenship we seem to be very stuck. As I understand things via a few phonecalls to the HO she would need / must have a valid European passport to acquire this and as outlined above her passport would just have expired and with no prospect of gaining a new one, we also looked into if she could apply in advance of the 5 years prior to the Swiss passport expiring but were told "no" that she must have completed 5 years residency here to gain PR.
What really frustrates me is I called any number of times the "0300" HO number prior to applying for my stepdaughters British Citizenship and checked we could apply even though my stepdaughter had only been in the U.K 2 years, and had entered on a Swiss passport, no visa ect ect, I went into every possible detail of her circumstances and situation but all I was ever told was "Yes" we could apply, there were no residency requirements as she was a 7 year old minor, as Mum already had her Citizenship we could apply - no ILR necessary as she had entered on Swiss passport ect, this we did then we fail due to her not being "settled" here, and to be settled her she must either have ILR or have lived here for 5 years to then gain PR, both of which I was repeatedly assured were not necessary prior to making the application, I checked and checked so many times!!!.
Should we appeal using form NR with a cover letter explaining our predicament or is this likely a waste of time and money ?, can anybody suggest a way forward as to me it seems whilst my stepdaughter can legally reside her now and is not breaking any immigration law being here, so there seems no realistic way forward for her to gain Citizenship alongside her Mum, she is in limbo and caught between a rock and a hard place, completely stuck.
I agree with what you said earlier. Based on the Chen ruling, she needs a CSI to be at a UK school as a self sufficient qualified person.noajthan wrote: Mention of overstay and leave to remain are wholly inappropriate as OP's daughter is not following a UK immigration trajectory.
I was wondering if the OP was paying attention to this as well.Richard W wrote:Brexit isn't the only issue. Swexit is also looking likely, as the Swiss people have formally rejected free movement.
CSI suggested back in April. A rational and prudent step to take (truly insurance in both the macro and micro contexts).Petaltop wrote:I agree with what you said earlier. Based on the Chen ruling, she needs a CSI to be at a UK school as a self sufficient qualified person.noajthan wrote: Mention of overstay and leave to remain are wholly inappropriate as OP's daughter is not following a UK immigration trajectory.
But now the OP has Brexit to think of too and I still don't understand why the OP didn't/doesn't just sponsor his step-daughter under UK immigration rules? Was this really all done to this child just to save a few bob?
Thank you, and Richard. I forgot the child has Swiss citizenship. I'll amend what I said above, below (as time has run out on my post.secret.simon wrote:
NB: The purpose of this post was merely to point out to the OP that the window of opportunity for his step-daughter is not Brexit, but Swexit in February 2017.
I'll let him answer for the state of his finances, though he has publicly stated that they have been under severe strain in the past few years. What he's said has led me to wonder whether he still meets the appropriate financial requirements for either the EEA or the national route.Petaltop wrote:But now the OP has Brexit and Swexit to think of too and I still don't understand why the OP didn't/doesn't just sponsor his step-daughter under UK immigration rules? Was this really all done to this child just to save a few bob?
It seems that that sort of thing was good enough for non-EEA family members of EEA nationals before the Metock judgement, when prior lawful residence in another EEA country was required as a condition for getting a family permit. It seems that lawful presence for a weekend constituted lawful residence. Source: Where Do you Reside?noajthan wrote:Someone can't pretend to be resident in Eire by virtue of a cheeky day trip (under the radar) when the family is clearly, ordinarily and habitually, resident in UK.
You might do better contacting this site about applying for a registration certificate. HO helplines are dangerously unreliable (it may be £65 an application, but it's months between results).ToonBarmy wrote:We have found an firm whom we can get CSI (for a minor) through, i will be contacting them again tomorrow and purchasing this, i will also contact HO regarding getting a RC.
From abroad, your daughter would go straight to ILE - that's ILR upon entering the UK - rather than following the stages of a spouse. Basically, this is because your wife has already done the progression.ToonBarmy wrote:It is a conundrum knowing what is the best way forward, getting the CSI in place, RC and planning to still attempt to gain PR or whatever is put into place post brexit as first option, i am not trying to go for PR over the LR, FLR, ILR route "to save a few bob", i except that with the uncertainty surrounding Brexit and with Swiss having there own referendum looming the door may be closed on a PR route anyway, simply we do not know.
I think you hit a very nasty booby-trap, one which will catch others, especially if the UK remains in the EEA, but also on the continent. I'm glad your finances have recovered - that gives you options.ToonBarmy wrote:Thankfully my finances have improved, asking why we did not go the visa route previously from within Thailand 3 years ago is surely pointless ?
I'm suggesting nothing of the sort as I don't buy into these imaginary schemes, concocted residencies and the like.Richard W wrote:...noajthan wrote:Someone can't pretend to be resident in Eire by virtue of a cheeky day trip (under the radar) when the family is clearly, ordinarily and habitually, resident in UK.
...
Aren't you suggesting that she play truant?
I think there may be residence issues, and I'm not sure if she can return to the UK without invalidating the application. That's why I had questions. It sounds too good to be true, but instead of cogent objections all I've had is scorn.ToonBarmy wrote:The Eire option you suggest also sounds interesting though not straightforward ?
Ref http://www.immigrationboards.com/eea-ro ... 12726.htmlRichard W wrote:I think there may be residence issues, and I'm not sure if she can return to the UK without invalidating the application. That's why I had questions. It sounds too good to be true, but instead of cogent objections all I've had is scorn.ToonBarmy wrote:The Eire option you suggest also sounds interesting though not straightforward ?
Well, that would give her a route to reside indefinitely in the UK, but it might only last for as long as she stayed in the UK. I can't see her being able to renew such a CTA entitlement if the UK or Switzerland severs the connection with the EEA, and I wouldn't be surprised if acquisition of the CTA entitlement became effectively restricted to Irish citizens again even if the UK stays in the EEA.noajthan wrote:Ref http://www.immigrationboards.com/eea-ro ... 12726.html
Why are Thailand and Switzerland the only options? Is it because an application has to be lodged from a country of nationality or the place of permanent residence? Obviously Thailand wouldn't qualify as a place of permanent residence - the girl lives in the UK!ToonBarmy wrote:As stated an application out of the UK (Thailand)...