- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
OL7MAX, it would just be nice for one's mind to be put at rest. All I wanted to know was if they'd dealt with cases regarding Access Rights. Getting legal advise sort encourage one that one is on the right path.OL7MAX wrote:FWIW, Twin, I've realised that you can't rely on solicitors' knowledge. You've been doing the right thing in researching it all yourself. Sadly, despite the huge amounts we pay solitictors our interests are best served by prodding them all the time."Why can't I use this ppron method?" or "Why can't I appeal under section xyz?" or "Under what law/section do you believe this deportation order can't be revoked?"
Get them to defend their every position with case laws and proof, make them earn their money.
http://www.ukvisas.gov.uk/servlet/Front ... nt%20eightAdministrator wrote:.
Do you have a couple of links to websites that describe (legally) what this right is and how to use it?
I think everyone will be interested to read them. Maybe we can find better information if we know which section(s) of the the law to search through.
An interesting thought ... I wonder if European Union law would support or grant this "right."
the Admin
Since we don't know every detail of your story, is it possible you are being advised that you personally, in your circumstances, do not or will not meet all the necessary criteria ..?Twin wrote:A solicitor actually advised me that if I leave the country, I should wave goodbye to returning to see my child while another said the best i'd get would be multiple entry visa.
Now, I need to know if indeed this is an accessible visa. Is it so hard to fulfil it's criteria or does it really exist at all? Why do few legal advisors know about it?
Actually, you're wrong as work is allowed as stated here: During the 12 month limited leave visa, the parent is entitled to work http://londonelegance.com/transpondia/singleparent/.Being allowed to enter to visit your child does not give you any other rights, for one example you would not be legally allowed to work to support yourself. You would have to demonstrate that you can support yourself in another way
..?All arrangements for where you live are in place? You have a proper court order
Hey Sakura, it's been a while. Glad to see you're well.sakura wrote:Twin, remember also the Chen case - as your daughter is a British Citizen, you can apply for residency in another EU/EEA country as the mother/family member of an EU citizen.
Of course I would suggest that you apply for the UK access to a child first, before anything else. But if all else fails, you can use the EEA regulations.
The above, from 321(iii), just list the grounds on which a person, with entry clearance, may be refused entry.Twin wrote:refusal is not justified on the grounds of restricted returnability, medical grounds, grounds of criminal record, or that the person is the subject of a deportation order or that his exclusion is conducive to the public good.
I understand that but it says refusal is not justified on the grounds of restricted returnability, medical grounds, grounds of criminal record, or that the person is the subject of a deportation order or that his exclusion is conducive to the public good.vinny wrote:The above, from 321(iii), just list the grounds on which a person, with entry clearance, may be refused entry.Twin wrote:refusal is not justified on the grounds of restricted returnability, medical grounds, grounds of criminal record, or that the person is the subject of a deportation order or that his exclusion is conducive to the public good.
actually, that paragraph you quoted says: (iii) refusal is justified on grounds of restricted return ability; on medical grounds; on grounds of criminal record; because the person seeking leave to enter is the subject of a deportation order or because exclusion would be conducive to the public good.vinny wrote:The above, from 321(iii), just list the grounds on which a person, with entry clearance, may be refused entry.Twin wrote:refusal is not justified on the grounds of restricted returnability, medical grounds, grounds of criminal record, or that the person is the subject of a deportation order or that his exclusion is conducive to the public good.
In order words, if refusal is justified, then the Immigration Officer will not be satisfied!The main points on which the immigration officer needs to be satisfied are that: ...
... refusal is not justified ...