Well I would say that I've had a good lay persons stab at it, and refered to the law where ever I can. I wouldn't say it was meticulous, it's probably very naive, but my standard of English and expression is reasonably high.OL7MAX wrote:Appeal tribunals - as with most magistrates/judges/recorders in the legal system - get impressed by meticulously done research and careful preparation. It panders to their ego and makes them feel favourably disposed towards you.
The overall impression of this man may be that if he entered into a "marriage of convenience" before (you did state she married him to "help him with his visa") he has shown bad faith and willingness to break the law and so shouldn't be allowed into the UK again. But I like your spunk and wish you good luck.
I hear what your saying.... The case for his marriage wasn't strong and quite frankly their applications were utter rubbish. But, it was never properly suggested in the refusals that there's was a marriage of convenience. They did have some good supporting evidence. The refusal letters have actually been useful in showing me not what to do!