- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
Which SectionA319 are you referring to? I am unable to find one in the Immigration Rules. Can you post a link to it and if possible, also the text?OA567 wrote:Section A319 Should Prevent Any Consequence Of A Previous Immigration Offence Prior To Applying Now
That is to say that she is behaving in a way that means that she is trying to get around the Immigration Rules and that a marriage could just be the latest in a series of steps to get around the rules. Appearances are against her application, which is why your evidence about the genuine relationship becomes even more important.OA567 wrote:"Satisfied That This Conduct Is Consistent With That Described As Her Having Contrived In A Significant Way To Frustrate The Intentions Of The Immigration Rules"
A letter from the church is not useful. You need proof of "Regular Contact, Signs Of Companionship, Emotional Support, Affection, And, Abididng Interest In Each Other's Welfare, And, Well Being Throughout The Entire Duration Of The Relationship." That would be things like phone call logs, Skype call logs, list of emails sent (not the content), photographs together covering the period from 11/02/2014 (when the relationship began) to date.OA567 wrote:5. REASON FOR REFUSAL - Case Officer States That He Is Not "Convinced" That Our Relationship Is Not Genuine. In Relation To Our Relationship, It Began On 11/02/2014, And, That We Were Married On 09/02/2015. Also, That We Last Saw Each Other 1 Day After Our Wedding On 10/02/2015. He Said That: He Expected To See "More Evidence" Because In A Genuine Subsisting , Supportive And Affectionate Relationship, There Would Be Evidence Of Regular Contact, Signs Of Companionship, Emotional Support, Affection, And, Abididng Interest In Each Other's Welfare, And, Well Being Throughout The Entire Duration Of The Relationship.
MY ARGUMENT - To Include Letter From Church Where We Met. This Will Verify Everything About Our Relationship In The Application
320(11) can only be overturned upon appeal, in my experience.Appeal32011 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2017 6:22 pmOA567 What was the outcome of your appeal? My case is very similar to yours- I applied from Nigeria, I overstayed my visit visa, went to the UK as a minor and undertook a degree at the University. I met every other requirement though (financial and relationship) and I didn't work during my stay there. I was refused under 320(11)
Currently waiting for an appeal date or- if lucky- an ECM overturn
I hope to hear back from you
I am merely expressing my own personal view. In all my cases involving 320(11) and that does not include ones in which the factual matrix was wrong, or there has been a mixed up with other cases, the matter has only been resolved at the tribunal, where a judge decided whether the decision breaches the convention right of the person.Appeal32011 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2017 7:40 pm@Obie this is not true. Search for username Gbegum on this platform (re: Pakistan UK spouse visa appeals), whose 320 (11) was overturned by the ECM. See this username's message on Sept 16, 2016.