- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
You can choose to either say either the Oath of Allegiance (religious) or the Affirmation of Allegiance (non-religious).William Blake wrote:What oath do you take? What if someoen has a religous objection to saying the oath is there a provision for this?
I totally concur with that. My wife received her Certificate of Naturalisation, and my step-daughter her Certificate of Registration, at a Citizenship Ceremony 4 years ago. The photo taken on the day .... their certificates being handed to them by Birmingham's Lord Mayor, is still prominently displayed in our living room.the people I went with who were being naturalised were happy with the event; certainly they have a photo taken at the ceremony on prominent display in their house
I can understand that too. The government really ought to be apprised of this sentiment during its thinking about revising the Nationality laws and requirements: I suspect it is a very common feeling.RobinLondon wrote:I respect what you say about others' experiences. I do. But to be honest, the most heartfelt emotion that I'll experience during such a ceremony will be relief with not having to deal with the Home Office any longer.
I think a lot of us share the same feeling. Probably because we are all treated very similarly. Its diffcult because its like the first day you set foot or furthermore want to set foot on British soil the British administration oppresses you from day one and fights against your intention to become a citizen. Then when you do make it - be fortunate enough to slip through they expect you to say how proud you are to be here and to take side with 'them' - pledge allegiance to that same adminsitration that opposed you for years - 10, 14 or longer. That took your taxes for all those years but wants to have no obligation to you. And that's hard because how can you identify wholeheartedly - as if there is no ill feeling or ill will towards you - with an adminstration that does not want you here. That refused to speak on your behalf that on a daily basis says bad things about you, exploits you and seeks to use underhanded tactics to exclude you from this society when your time comes and wants to have no obligation to you.RobinLondon wrote:
To reiterate, I quite like this country and the people who live in it. And I think they like me (perhaps). It's just the Home Office's fun and games that I'm not too fond of. I'll be curious to see if the strains of God Save the Queen on my ceremony day (if I'm approved, of course!) are able to dissolve this bitterness in my heart.
Those who become American citizens usually have a lot of positive feelings towards the U.S. but also tend to feel a great sense of relief at no longer needing to deal with the Immigration Service (passports are a State Department responsibility).Christophe wrote:As I said, it is a pity those in the government responsible for the way that Home Office conducts its business can't hear of these sentiments. I don't believe that the average immigrant to, say, Australia or New Zealand feels the same way; and I also believe that such feelings are not uncommon now in the UK. (I have no firm proof of those opinions, of course, merely anecdotal evidence.)
10 to 15 years ago, or more specifically, prior to May 1997, the immigration system was managed in a much more sustainable way. Without the wild swings in policy that we have seen under the current administration.I also don't believe that it has always been thus: the Home Office has been historically slow and possibly even incompetent, but I don't think that, say, 10 or 15 years ago people who had moved to this country felt as if they had been "wrung out and left to dry" in quite the way that lots do now.