- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
Not disclosing the travel histories/visa applications even to other countries leads to deception and challenging that decision might be very difficult on grounds that why only a rejected decision wasn't mentioned but granted visa decisions/travel history to Australia & Newzealand was disclosed without mistake.Jas2013 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:29 pmMy best friend was a sponsor of his in-law's visit visa application. However, it was rejected as they didn't mention that their visa application to Ireland was rejected previously. Homeoffice in their letter have confirmed that they consider this as deception and therefore installed a 10- year ban. His in -laws have a good travel history and have travelled to Australia , New Zealand . Home office says that any further application will have similar results unless there is a change in circumstances. My question is what can they do to address this 'change in circumstances' and if they re-apply and state in a cover letter that it was a genuine mistake will home office take note of it.
Maybe or maybe not depending on individual caseworkers.
Thinking like a case worker, for the way it sounds, it seems like they have omitted the previous visa application on purpose, and it's logical to be assumed as deception.
In an ideal situation, every application should be assessed in their own merit regardless of others applications. However, if the sponsor is the same for a previous application that got a 10-year ban, it's logical to think that the next application (even if it's for their parents) will be scrutinised further.