- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
I think your main challenge is the pattern. You seem to have repeated offences which might impact on your good charater.Art84 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2020 8:39 amTo my opinion the below is not conviction/caution so may not be stated as no further actions were taken and I have not been charged
10/06/12 - DESTROY OR DAMAGE PROPERTY (VALUE OF DAMAGE £5000.00 OR LESS
• NFA (NO FURTHER ACTION)
03/07/16 - ASSAULT OCCASIONING ACTUAL BODILY HARM
• NFA (NO FURTHER ACTION)
As Amber said last out of court disposal was 6 years ago - 'The time that has lapsed since the applicant last received a non-custodial sentence/out-of-court disposal. The longer that has lapsed since the non-custodial sentence/out-of-court disposal was given, the less likely for refusal.'
Also caseworker should take to account 'the age of the applicant at the time he committed the offence(s). The younger the applicant at the time of the offence, the less likely this will lead to a refusal.
In 2008 I was 24 y.o., not married. In 2013 when was the last penalty notice issued I was at the age of 29, also not married
I am 35 now and married...
New/more comments welcome
The trouble is anyone working your case will have same access to the unfiltered version in your first post above. The NFA cases, if they were stand alone, they would be disregarded however they are in amongst a laundry list of other offences so I don't see how they can be disregarded. They could be NFA due to lack of evidence and not because the offence didn't occur.Art84 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2020 7:36 amHi Djsuccess,
Without taking NFA to account as there were no charge...
As per below from 'Good Character Guidance' it does not seem to me I am 'persistent offender'...
‘When considering whether the applicant falls to be refused because they are a persistent offender, caseworker must consider:
• the number of offences committed, the seriousness of those offences and the timescale over which they were committed
• the impact of the offences on the public
• whether the offences have escalated in seriousness
For example, a person who has committed 4 minor offences in 10 years in the UK might not be viewed as a persistent offender, whereas a person who commits 3 offences in just 6 months, might be.’
- 16/06/08
- 27/12/09
- 30/09/12
1-2: 18months (1yr 6mths)
- 30/06/13
2-3: 45months (3yrs 9mths)
3-4: 9months
4-to date: 79months (6yrs 6mths)
Does this really look persistent?