- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
nishadhawn@rediffmail.com wrote:Sorry I updated my original message and removed bolds
nishadhawn@rediffmail.com wrote:I did maintained the funds 2800 gbp for past 3 months
nishadhawn@rediffmail.com wrote:My Originals >> My Passport , MArriage certificate and my son's Birth Certificate, which was earlier returned to me by BHC is still with me
Will they call me for an interview and should I then give these docs to them?
However, rejection letters don't usually have only this much text, Caseworkers give concrete and precise reasons why they have rejected the application.Problem
I applied for Entry clearance to UK from Delhi and i have got the following reply from the Visa Officer
" I have refused your visa application on this occasion becuase i am not satisfied on the balance of probabilities, that you meet all of the requirement of paragraph 245F of the immigration Rules.
Points awarded
HSMP -75
English language -10
Maintenance - 0
Since some points aren't clear from your earlier posts, answers to the following questions will help understand your case.nishadhawn@rediffmail.com wrote: Question
My Originals >> My Passport , MArriage certificate and my son's Birth Certificate, which was earlier returned to me by BHC is still with me
Will they call me for an interview and should I then give these docs to them?
Reason of rejection by BHC case workerSo can you write the following:
1. Exact sub clause of Immigration rule 245F under which your application is rejected.
2. Exact reasoning given by caseworker when he rejected your application.
This will give us more insight as to why your application was rejected and we can remove guess work when we try to give suggestions.
I hope you are aware that you can only use those accounts where you are the sole account holder or a joint account holder with your spouse - as evidence of maintenance funds. So in your case where 3 applications were made (self+2 dependents) and if you used more than one bank account (as BHC claims), the following applies (in my personal opinion based on my understanding):-nishadhawn@rediffmail.com wrote:As evidence that you meet this requirement of the Immigration Rules you have submitted photocopied bank statements in your own name and photocopied bank statements in the name of a third party.
The bank statements must contain all account details as prescribed in the policy guidance and must be presented in one of the following formats:nishadhawn@rediffmail.com wrote:the bank gave the statements in plain paper with bank stamp+ sign ( WHICH I think might have looked to them like a photocopied statement) however was dated only 1 day old from submission of EC application
is a mandatory requirement.• the financial institution’s name and logo;
The letter must be issued within 7 days preceding the application.nishadhawn@rediffmail.com wrote:b) Confirmation Letter from bank in Original bank letter headed paper stating that i have maintained 6000 gbp in last 3 mths including quarters , however this letter was around 20 days old WHICH could also be a reason for rejection
If BHC allows FDs as acceptable evidence of maintenance funds, then you need to provide a letter from the bank (on letterheaded paper) confirming that you have held the FDs for min. 3 months and that monies held (all or some, as the case may be) can be liquidated/encashed anytime. This letter also must be issued within 7 days preceding the application.nishadhawn@rediffmail.com wrote:c) VFS helpline told me additionally I can also include Original FDs in name of self/wife/spouse (WHICH I think might have led to some confusion for BHC)
Will leave it to you to judge if there are any chances of the original decision being overturned. All the best!Tier 1 policy guidance - Annex C wrote:Applicants MUST NOT send any additional documents such as passport or supporting documents with the Administrative Review request notice. If the refusal is subsequently overturned, the applicant will be asked to send in their passport.
The applicant is not allowed to provide new evidence. Any new evidence will be disregarded unless the applicant was refused under paragraph 320 (7A) or 320 (7B) of the Immigration Rules on General Grounds for Refusal (see paragraph 12).
If this isn't new evidence, then what do you define it as? Updated evidence?? In that case, AFAIK *updated* evidence is also not accepted with administrative review. But for your sake I hope I am wrong!nishadhawn@rediffmail.com wrote:2) Along with above I also attached the updated papers for proof of Maintenance of funds :-
b) On the bank's letterheaded paper my current balance i.e. showing INR money which is required >6000 GBP, also the same letter contained last 2 quarters balances which also indicated above 6000 GBP
c) Last 3 months's statement On bank's computer stationary which has the bank name & logo on it signed and stamped
I hope above will be acceptable and not treated as any new docs
FYI: I had given above docs in original application also only difference was that point 2)c) was on plain paper instead of bank computer stationery