Hi Snooky, please is this the regulation 16(5), the HO claimed I was refused based on or is this a different one?.snooky wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 5:55 pmI can't fathom with the HO. Their sole motivation is money and not the welfare of anyone including the children. Do not be pushed, they will use the same rules to refuse the EEA application.LULUBABY wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 5:37 pmThanks for making me feel better. I really appreciate your very prompt reply at this moment. At least the silver lining from this attempt is that they admitted that I am the primary carer of my child.snooky wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 5:23 pmLULUBABY
Sorry to hear what HO sent to you. Within your refusal they still claim that they recognised you as a primary carer.
Is all about money. Thats Why I have advise you guys to do EEA Zambrano because search nonesense will never be tolerated by any Court.
All what they said has been thrown out by the courts but HO still using these guidances to score gals.
Wait for your Drf1 application and when that comes with refusal, the courts will allow the appeal. Already they have compelled you to leave the member State but still denied it
Almost all people who even want for Zambrano renewal were refused and had to go to Court. Again all new to be Zambrano to are refused since May 2019.
Everyone had to go to the courts and won the case by virtue of regulation 16 not Home Office guidance. What i know is HO want the courts to grant Zambrano not them. That's Why they dont even defend the refusal at the courts. Agenda is to give few people status under EU Settlement Scheme Zambrano Route.
So far all their refusal are for the People who applied before the change of FTT came in
Cheer up. I know it hurts but keep the fight on
(a)the person is the primary carer of a British citizen (“BC”);
(b)BC is residing in the United Kingdom; and
(c)BC would be unable to reside in the United Kingdom or in another EEA State if the person left the United Kingdom for an indefinite period.
I ask because (c) didn’t say if the person was asked to leave by the HO. It states if THE PERSON LEFT FOR AN INDEFINITE PERIOD.