Oops. I am sorry. Perhaps you misunderstood. I never said it was not credible. I just meant it is neither credible nor not credible. It is just an opinion. The diamond reference alludes to the name of the world's biggest diamond mined so far, and your posts have shined a beacon to others just like the well-cut precious stone.CULLINAN wrote: ↑Fri Sep 11, 2020 2:11 am@krishnakumarg
Even if I did not have my catch-all signature, my track record (4.6K posts) shows the credibility of my posts. I am not here to justify my credibility to anyone.In this case, our diamond author is well absolved by his catch-all signature, and I am satisfied by it.
Just for the record I have 400 posts alone on this topic alone which is 10% contribution from my side. My posts alone speak for my credibility. No signature needed.
PS its not “Diamond” author. Its “Respected Guru” author. Please quote your citations properly.
Of course, your opinion counts a lot more here, in the same vein as an expert commentator in any other walk of life. And, I am happy with your signature which makes it patently clear that all posts are your personal opinion.
I am good with all of that, and so are almost everyone else. Where was the offense?