- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
Hi Dnicky,dnicky wrote:If your application for new leave to remain against you new work permit was done after expiry of your old leave to reamin against your old work permit, then UKBA will unfortunately treat this as a break in your continuous residence while considering your ILR application.
I guess not. Existing LTR is deemed to be continous until the new application is decided. So he should be fine.dnicky wrote:If your application for new leave to remain against you new work permit was done after expiry of your old leave to reamin against your old work permit, then UKBA will unfortunately treat this as a break in your continuous residence while considering your ILR application.
No he is not fine. Otherwise OP wouldn't be posting here in the first place, HO has already rejected his ILR application.Existing LTR is deemed to be continous until the new application is decided. So he should be fine.
Hi SKUK,SKUK wrote:No he is not fine. Otherwise OP wouldn't be posting here in the first place, HO has already rejected his ILR application.Existing LTR is deemed to be continous until the new application is decided. So he should be fine.
You are allowed to remain in country only if you have FLR application pending to be decided and not change of employment work permit approval.
This would have been fine if your new employer has submitted an application for FLR(IED) with the WP applicaition to run concurrently.Reddy wrote:Hi SKUK,SKUK wrote:No he is not fine. Otherwise OP wouldn't be posting here in the first place, HO has already rejected his ILR application.Existing LTR is deemed to be continous until the new application is decided. So he should be fine.
You are allowed to remain in country only if you have FLR application pending to be decided and not change of employment work permit approval.
Your right, I had problem with ILR, but they hold my application , they want cross check it.
Kind regards.
Reddy
Hi SKUK,SKUK wrote:No he is not fine. Otherwise OP wouldn't be posting here in the first place, HO has already rejected his ILR application.Existing LTR is deemed to be continous until the new application is decided. So he should be fine.
You are allowed to remain in country only if you have FLR application pending to be decided and not change of employment work permit approval.
Explain them with this ruleReddy wrote:Hi SKUK,SKUK wrote:No he is not fine. Otherwise OP wouldn't be posting here in the first place, HO has already rejected his ILR application.Existing LTR is deemed to be continous until the new application is decided. So he should be fine.
You are allowed to remain in country only if you have FLR application pending to be decided and not change of employment work permit approval.
Your right, I had problem with ILR, but they hold my application , they want cross check it.
Kind regards.
Reddy
Hi Gainvidya,gainvidya wrote:Explain them with this ruleReddy wrote:Hi SKUK,SKUK wrote:No he is not fine. Otherwise OP wouldn't be posting here in the first place, HO has already rejected his ILR application.Existing LTR is deemed to be continous until the new application is decided. So he should be fine.
You are allowed to remain in country only if you have FLR application pending to be decided and not change of employment work permit approval.
Your right, I had problem with ILR, but they hold my application , they want cross check it.
Kind regards.
Reddy
Gainvidya, from 2004, application for a work permit is no longer an application for leave to remain. The original poster spent 3 months illegally in the UK (he was an overstayer), and he better be praying that the caseworker exercises his discretion.gainvidya wrote:Explain them with this rule
Hi All,paulp wrote:Gainvidya, from 2004, application for a work permit is no longer an application for leave to remain. The original poster spent 3 months illegally in the UK (he was an overstayer), and he better be praying that the caseworker exercises his discretion.gainvidya wrote:Explain them with this rule
Reddy, forget about that rule. It's not even a rule, they're instructions to caseworkers and don't apply in your case.