- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
IF he is writing the truth, there is nothing wrong with it. He is not putting her in danger. Sometimes life is difficult.jude wrote:Frontier , YOU MUST BE VERY FOOLISH TO ASK HIM TO WRITE TO BE HO ABOUT NOT LIVING OR SUPPORTING THE WIFE , WHAT NHAPPENED IF IT WAS THE OTHER WAY ROUND . U DO NOT PUT PEOPLE LIFE OR FUTURE IN DANGER.
hirepublique wrote:IF he is writing the truth, there is nothing wrong with it. He is not putting her in danger. Sometimes life is difficult.jude wrote:Frontier , YOU MUST BE VERY FOOLISH TO ASK HIM TO WRITE TO BE HO ABOUT NOT LIVING OR SUPPORTING THE WIFE , WHAT NHAPPENED IF IT WAS THE OTHER WAY ROUND . U DO NOT PUT PEOPLE LIFE OR FUTURE IN DANGER.
And again, if that scenario happened, then all he has to do is to write they have reconciled. thus there is no basis for him to not inform the HO of the current obligation. It is not wrong advice.arshadh141 wrote:
hi
i 100% agree with Jude..we shoud not guide people wrong thinks.
this forum is to help people...not to talk to their private life..
let assume if he wrote a letter to home office that he is not sponsoring his wife and after few days he has some agreement with his wife....home office will doubt their relationship and refuse their application for ILR so whole their family life would be disturbed..
we should not advise people wrong things...we should postively advise them as we can
reagrds
This forum is not about giving sugar coated "good" news to people - it is about doing the right thing. The OP asked a question and got the correct answer. If things change along the way then he can write again to UKBA and set out the new circumstances.arshadh141 wrote:hirepublique wrote:IF he is writing the truth, there is nothing wrong with it. He is not putting her in danger. Sometimes life is difficult.jude wrote:Frontier , YOU MUST BE VERY FOOLISH TO ASK HIM TO WRITE TO BE HO ABOUT NOT LIVING OR SUPPORTING THE WIFE , WHAT NHAPPENED IF IT WAS THE OTHER WAY ROUND . U DO NOT PUT PEOPLE LIFE OR FUTURE IN DANGER.
i 100% agree with Jude..we shoud not guide people wrong thinks.
this forum is to help people...not to talk to their private life..
let assume if he wrote a letter to home office that he is not sponsoring his wife and after few days he has some agreement with his wife....home office will doubt their relationship and refuse their application for ILR so whole their family life would be disturbed..
we should not advise people wrong things...we should postively advise them as we can
reagrds
Also I've noticed a trend of Indians/Pakistanis married to Poles/Latvians/Romanians etc, always stuck me as odd bedfellows, given that most of the former Eastern Bloc is endemically dearly beloved.Frontier Mole wrote:This forum is not about giving sugar coated "good" news to people - it is about doing the right thing. The OP asked a question and got the correct answer. If things change along the way then he can write again to UKBA and set out the new circumstances.arshadh141 wrote:hirepublique wrote:IF he is writing the truth, there is nothing wrong with it. He is not putting her in danger. Sometimes life is difficult.jude wrote:Frontier , YOU MUST BE VERY FOOLISH TO ASK HIM TO WRITE TO BE HO ABOUT NOT LIVING OR SUPPORTING THE WIFE , WHAT NHAPPENED IF IT WAS THE OTHER WAY ROUND . U DO NOT PUT PEOPLE LIFE OR FUTURE IN DANGER.
i 100% agree with Jude..we shoud not guide people wrong thinks.
this forum is to help people...not to talk to their private life..
let assume if he wrote a letter to home office that he is not sponsoring his wife and after few days he has some agreement with his wife....home office will doubt their relationship and refuse their application for ILR so whole their family life would be disturbed..
we should not advise people wrong things...we should postively advise them as we can
reagrds
To be blunt the number of times I see a non EEA spouse "did not work out" story with the "do not tell the Home Office as it stops them from staying here" quote is sickening. THEY SHOULD NOT BE STAYING HERE IF THEY HAVE NO RIGHT TO DO SO. And then you get the inevitable story of domestic violence about five minutes after they are found out they should not be here. What it all actually achieves is an increasingly negative view on marriages from certain countries. This forum is full of PAK marriages going down the pan and the fallout arising from that. Is it any wonder with comments of "don't tell the HO that the marriage has failed" that there is a healthy dose of scepticism about PAK marriages. Are they all about true love or getting someone into the UK? You can not tell me there are not enough PAK decedents in the UK to meet the demands for partners?
Getting married to an UK cit is not a ticket to a future of milk and honey, regardless of the failure of the marriage in the first two years. If the marriage fails, they should go home end of. The OP should be applauded for doing the right thing.
I completely agree with Frontier Mole. People come on here sobbing when their spouse's or fiance's visa gets rejected and I silently or not so silently think, "Thank God." because it probably was a sham marriage anyway and they would be on the board in a couple months time whining about their failed marriage.Frontier Mole wrote: This forum is not about giving sugar coated "good" news to people - it is about doing the right thing. The OP asked a question and got the correct answer. If things change along the way then he can write again to UKBA and set out the new circumstances.
To be blunt the number of times I see a non EEA spouse "did not work out" story with the "do not tell the Home Office as it stops them from staying here" quote is sickening. THEY SHOULD NOT BE STAYING HERE IF THEY HAVE NO RIGHT TO DO SO. ...
This forum is full of PAK marriages going down the pan and the fallout arising from that. Is it any wonder ... that there is a healthy dose of scepticism about PAK marriages. Are they all about true love or getting someone into the UK? ...
If the marriage fails, they should go home end of. The OP should be applauded for doing the right thing.
I find your opinion that most Eastern Europeans are endemically dearly beloved to be a dearly beloved statmentWanderer wrote:Also I've noticed a trend of Indians/Pakistanis married to Poles/Latvians/Romanians etc, always stuck me as odd bedfellows, given that most of the former Eastern Bloc is endemically dearly beloved.
Then follows the inevitable divorce/separation and the when-can-I-apply-for-my-PR questions....
hi Frontier Mole and Wandererarchigabe wrote:I find your opinion that most Eastern Europeans are endemically dearly beloved to be a dearly beloved statmentWanderer wrote:Also I've noticed a trend of Indians/Pakistanis married to Poles/Latvians/Romanians etc, always stuck me as odd bedfellows, given that most of the former Eastern Bloc is endemically dearly beloved.
Then follows the inevitable divorce/separation and the when-can-I-apply-for-my-PR questions....
The divorce rate is irrelevant because the English Marriages didn't need to be sponsored by a visa.arshadh141 wrote: If I ask what is Divorce Rate is Uk you will forget Pak Sham Marriages and start thinging about English Marriages..
I think you need to modify your post to not include me in the so called dearly beloved statement as my comments are not even the close to dearly beloved or even provocative in this threadran wrote:Hi,
F mole, rep and wanderer....
I agree with u that sham marriages for visa is a big issue and a much exploited one, especially from some countries and agree with rep... that u should compare apples to apples.... i also agree that u shouldn't beat abt the bush and call spade a spade.
But b4 condemning most Pak/Indian marriages as sham (as per f mole's post) and making sweeping statements - most eastern eurpoeans are endemically dearly beloved please take a moment to think through what u r saying and how it represents u.....
i have to say by ur own standards (i have come across ur very useful and helpful advice, to many people on many occasions in the past in this forum) the above statements r a bit over the top and def very conservative if not dearly beloved.
Regards,
ran
Hiran wrote:Hi rep,
I do not think so - please check ur post Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:49 am, first paragraph!
Regards,
ran
In any case, it is still good advice to inform the HO when the relationship has ended because that is the sponsors obligation. Full Stop.arshadh141 wrote:Hiran wrote:Hi rep,
I do not think so - please check ur post Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:49 am, first paragraph!
Regards,
ran
I do agree that we should compare apple with apple.I agree with Ran with this statement.
My point was Sham marraiges are everywhere not just in PAk or India...That way I said what is divorce rate in Uk...
My point was about good advice not about sham marrages or statements.
I like Fronter Mole and his often read his post..
republique wrote:In any case, it is still good advice to inform the HO when the relationship has ended because that is the sponsors obligation. Full Stop.arshadh141 wrote:Hiran wrote:Hi rep,
I do not think so - please check ur post Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:49 am, first paragraph!
Regards,
ran
I do agree that we should compare apple with apple.I agree with Ran with this statement.
My point was Sham marraiges are everywhere not just in PAk or India...That way I said what is divorce rate in Uk...
My point was about good advice not about sham marrages or statements.
I like Fronter Mole and his often read his post..
Irrelevant that you agree because I still dispute that there was any beloved engendered in my comment. I think you guys are a bit too sensitive and looking for problems where it doesn't exist.