snooky wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:26 am
Ngoo wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 6:59 am
snooky wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 10:52 pm
High Court finds the EU Settlement Scheme rules for Zambrano carers unlawful.
R (Akinsanya) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 1535 (Admin),
My advise to all who applied for zambrano before 31 December 2020 should reapply and invoke this high court judgement.
If you guys sit thinking HO will be writing to you to ask you guys to resubmit will be a dream which will never come through.
Bear in mind that HO can appeal this to deter people applying. Irrespective of their shenanigans, putting in your reapplication and letting them know of their discrimination towards you from the onset will let you stay in the game past 30 June 2020.
From the unreported cases which ruled HO policy and guidance unlawful to this, you guys now have the power especially those who identified themselves as zambrano before the end of the eea rules.
With me snooky, I saw this loophole in the EEA REG 16 7A long time and used it for so many people. As far as the former HO Secretaries refused to amend it through parliament and left it as it was then any guidance was to be treated null and void.
LTR isn't an exempt stay and thus comes under PSIC . 13(2) of the Asylum and Immigration Act 1996.
HO grammar has killed them like highe seat which killed miss Thomas' cat and also the greedy dog loses its bone.
The court has spoken and spoke very well.
Regards
@ Snooky, this is good news for all Zambrano carers . Best of luck to all the people that are still waiting and those that need to reapply. Keep going by God’s grace you will all get there.
So Snooky, with the present situation must you have an EEA card to apply as a Zambrano carer? That’s for either refused Zambrano carer or first timer. Remain blessed.
So Snooky, with the present situation must you have an EEA card to apply as a Zambrano carer? That’s for either refused Zambrano carer or first timer. Remain blessed.
You do not and has never be part of any promulgated laws from parliament.
HO played a good chess game with all zambrano people and the weak heart gave up, the lawyers as I have most time lashed them were not interested to use their knowledge of law to salvage the situation and lawyers helped HO to circulat fake news and pit fear in people
When I first ask people to bang in applications both eea and euss zambrano, lawyers disagreed with me and and called me reckless including those with LTR.
But the laws were clear. Laws supercedes guidance and trust me most people hear have got their ILR through their braveness .
You do not need to have a EEA card before you qualify as in Senneh vs SSWP ruling.
But this ruling really affect those who applied before we left the EU and the implementation period.
Now there's a case against the HO to extend the euss for zambrano people as they were not allowed to apply due to HO misinformation
[/quote]
Honestly Snooky, HO scored an own goal. HO has been dismantled into pieces and the bits piled into a heap. The Judge's analysis and choice of words - CLASSIC.
The Judge spoke for us all. Snooky remember when my LTR was expiring and we were all hoping they will keep delaying so I can qualify based on the guidance?. It then expired and you were like good, they have no option now but to give it to me, but to everybody's greatest shock they refused.
Paragraph 53 of that Judgement was my scenario, I have been reading it over and over again.
We have been saying it on this forum that a Zambrano carer is a Zambrano carer with or without a derivative card or LTR.
This Judgement is an OMG! piece.
That HO lawyer said he couldn't read what I wrote, I was making no sense, he was struggling to understand what point I was making. Fast forward June 9, 2021... In your face!. Who is having the last laugh?.