- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
Yes i did apply for eu settlement scheme in February 2021 and won appeal and i have submitted passport but i received same emails that we will review it that
in last post date was not written correctly.tpveen wrote: ↑Wed Jul 21, 2021 7:04 pmYes i did apply for eu settlement scheme in February 2020 and won appeal and i have submitted passport but i received same emails that we will review it that
If you do not meet the requirements and we are unable to switch your EEA family permit to an EU Settlement scheme family permit, we will contact you to let you know and advise of next steps.
So its auto gernated emails , because common sense explains that if they have our passports and will not endorsed permits, people will eat the name lord of justice, i hope this email will help you.
I did not ask you those questions.tpveen wrote: ↑Wed Jul 21, 2021 7:04 pmYes i did apply for eu settlement scheme in February 2021 and won appeal and i have submitted passport but i received same emails that we will review it that
If you do not meet the requirements and we are unable to switch your EEA family permit to an EU Settlement scheme family permit, we will contact you to let you know and advise of next steps.
So its auto gernated emails , because common sense explains that if they have our passports and will not endorsed permits, people will eat the name lord of justice, i hope this email will help you.
There is no retrospective effect given to statutory provision here. The provision giving effect was withdrawn and the Home Office are saying there is no provision to grant entry, due to repealing of the provision.Kash143 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 28, 2021 8:44 amThe presumption against the retroactive operation of legislation
186. At common law there is a presumption that a statute does not have "retrospective" effect. The statement in Maxwell on The Interpretation of Statutes, 12th ed (1969), p 215 is frequently quoted:
"Upon the presumption that the legislature does not intend what is unjust rests the leaning against giving certain statutes a retrospective operation. They are construed as operating only in cases or on facts which come into existence after the statutes were passed unless a retrospective effect is clearly intended. It is a fundamental rule of English law that no statute shall be construed to have a retrospective operation unless such a construction appears very clearly in the terms of the Act, or arises by necessary and distinct implication."