- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
sorry didnt see ur thread earlier..kara wrote:Hello everyone,
I'm very happy to report that my Admin Review request was successful and the earlier refusal has been overturned.
Praise the Lord! My good wishes and prayers for everyone else who has applied.
Kara
Hi,kara wrote:Hello everyone,
I'm very happy to report that my Admin Review request was successful and the earlier refusal has been overturned.
Praise the Lord! My good wishes and prayers for everyone else who has applied.
Kara
Dear Kara and All,kara wrote:Hi!
I applied for the Admin Review on October 29th and received my result on December 18.
Kara
Please note that the member himself has said that he provided letter from Bank from 18th July,2008 to 15th October,2008 and NOT for 3 Calender Months (Bank could not have provided such a letter for "3Month period" as it would have been factually incorrect.ramesh1 wrote:push_hsmp true as per the guidelines it should be 15th july to 15th october is my understanding what if he has provided only bank statements from 18th july to 15th october as already bank letter for him stated that it is 3 months (18th july to 15th october) so it should not be a problem since he provided 12 month statement it gave a chance for the CW?
Re the 12 month's statement, I believe the caseworker did look at the statements and as noted by the applicant himself (below) the balance dropped below the requisite levels within the 3 Months period i.e. on 15th and 17th July & hence the rejection.prajapativijay wrote:I had provided Bank Authority letter from 18th July,2008 to 15th October,2008 with 12 month statement.
So I am not sure what are you driving at. All I am saying is that the case worker did apply the rules correctly. Re the Admin Review, if BHC takes a slightly lenient view, they might approve the application although I would be a bit skeptical about that.prajapativijay wrote:My Bank Balance didn't go below 2.49lac(Equivalent to 3k pound) in those period(90 days). But they gave reason for refusal that on 15th and 17th July Balance was not sufficient and it's true.
I can understand your pain but all I am saying is, if the rules are applied strictly (which I believe is the case more often than not) then your disqualification is justified. Now that you have already appealed lets wait for the outcome and hope for the best. Lets hope the New Year brings you a good news.prajapativijay wrote:Hi push_hsmp,
I am agree with your comments. But i have seen lots of people(in this forum) got visa even they maintain balance for around 88 to 90 days as BHC might be lenient on their cases. Hence i have applied on 16th October with 90 days period. Even i could applied on 19th October that way i could have required 3 month balance but did not get leave due to work load thus applied on 16th October.
Even maintenance balance did not go below 3k pound in those 90 days period and got good points(95) in other attributes(Education,Previous Earnings,Age,English Language). I am also maintaining required balance(around 3k pound) in my account till date and ready to provide statement if BHC want(also mentioned in covering letter with review request).
Thank you,
It does not matter how we or other consultants interpret the HO's requirement because we/consultants are not going to make a decision on VISA applications. What is important here is the the Caseworker's interpretation of the rule, who clearly seems to think (& I would say rightly so) that 3 months is 3 calendar month and not 90 days. We can continue to argue on the point but can not affect the outcome of a VISA application.ramesh1 wrote:Push that is good note to calcuate the 3 month slot as appropriate when i was browsing a website
http://www.hsmphelphere.com/news_tier1_ ... enance.php
i believe they are consultants for tier-1 it seems they say 90 days.
again i am feeling unfair about the 3 month rule because for different people (based on their 3 month slot) no of days varies as you stated above again as an average 90days (3*30) should be fair deal hmm..but whatever BHC decides is the catch.
to add to the abov consultants many consultants whom i talk to india also states only 90days....very misleading hmm....
Sounds prudent but we are discussing a case where someone submitted statement covering 90 days and got a rejection.sv23367 wrote:I would suggest to maintain the balance for atleast 100 days prior to the date of application. When we apply immediately after crossing 90 days there are high chances for rejection.
Additionally to put to rest any doubts about this (although I am quoting from a different section (Earnings) of the Guidance Notes, I think it fairly represents HO's approach), please note:ramesh1 wrote:Push that is good note to calcuate the 3 month slot as appropriate when i was browsing a website
http://www.hsmphelphere.com/news_tier1_ ... enance.php
i believe they are consultants for tier-1 it seems they say 90 days.
again i am feeling unfair about the 3 month rule because for different people (based on their 3 month slot) no of days varies as you stated above again as an average 90days (3*30) should be fair deal hmm..but whatever BHC decides is the catch.
to add to the abov consultants many consultants whom i talk to india also states only 90days....very misleading hmm....
83. All the periods we specify are calendar months (for example 14 January – 13 February).
I got result for Admin Review and Refusal is upheld. so i have applied again as fresh application and got visa this time.push_hsmp wrote:It does not matter how we or other consultants interpret the HO's requirement because we/consultants are not going to make a decision on VISA applications. What is important here is the the Caseworker's interpretation of the rule, who clearly seems to think (& I would say rightly so) that 3 months is 3 calendar month and not 90 days. We can continue to argue on the point but can not affect the outcome of a VISA application.ramesh1 wrote:Push that is good note to calcuate the 3 month slot as appropriate when i was browsing a website
http://www.hsmphelphere.com/news_tier1_ ... enance.php
i believe they are consultants for tier-1 it seems they say 90 days.
again i am feeling unfair about the 3 month rule because for different people (based on their 3 month slot) no of days varies as you stated above again as an average 90days (3*30) should be fair deal hmm..but whatever BHC decides is the catch.
to add to the abov consultants many consultants whom i talk to india also states only 90days....very misleading hmm....
I would advice the member to file an admin review (I think he has already filed one) saying that he interpreted 3 months to mean 90 days and that he continue to maintain the balance a number of days beyond 90 day period. They might show some leniency or be a bit more practical/reasonable and might come back with a positive outcome.