- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
Ravian, can you be a bit more precise. In 2007 when your mum applied for the extension of her Work Permit, did she apply for FLR at the same time? Because the two are separate.ravian3 wrote:Not we didnt overstayed becuase we put another application after we got refused the first time which took tym to get reply but now i want iformation about somthing else after we got refused second tym my barristor put our application on HUMAN RIGHT ACT ARTICAL 8 and i dont know anything about it cn u just guide me about this and tell me was it the best option??
Thx in advance
It's bad news I'm afraid. If your mum didn't apply for FLR "in time", then I'm afraid Wanderer is right and you have been overstayers ever since.ravian3 wrote:no she didnt apply for FLR she applied for work permit extension only.
I have no agenda, I'm not supporting any team, nor would I detract from the achievements of that noble band of Presenting Officers.Frontier Mole wrote:Mr Rusty -
Who would argue with a barrister - a Presenting Officer would
AND who wins the most in court - that would be the Presenting Officers!!!
Come on support the home team.
So as for barristers go, they are as good as the appellants’ history and in the most part in country refusal appeals do not have a good history.
On the basis of the known story on this one - the Art 8 claim will not hold up so there is little chance of winning even with a soft judge.