Hello Agyapa,Agyapa wrote: ↑Thu Jun 30, 2022 6:45 pmPlease don't close the forum. I believe majority of us are benefiting from your detailed analyses on the Zambrano jurisprudence. I personally wouldn't have applied to the EUSS if not for the information provided by members like yourself, Snooky and others. I can testify that I used all the information posted here to support my friend to get her settled status, the battle of which started in 2019. We did this against the numerous advice of many Radio and facebook lawyers who thought anyone with limited leave to remain under Appendix FM was not entitled to get a status under the EUSS. Many thanks for your posts. We appreciate them.forney-again wrote: ↑Thu Jun 30, 2022 4:01 pmThe fact that the judges now accept that the EEA Regulations do NOT say
Zambrano carers can not hold limited leave to remain under Appendix FM, and still be considered a Zambrano carer,
is a massive, massive win for Zambrano carers!!!
The Home Office argument revolves around two points. The EEA Regulations and the "Zambrano Jurisprudence." So, it's one point down, one to go.
The other point about Zambrano jurisprudence is highly nuanced. What cases constitute "Zambrano jurisprudence?" It's a free for all out there.
Another key problem is psychological. The Court of Appeal would have to 'eat crow' as they say, and accept that they were wrong. Maybe, just maybe, the judges in the Court of Appeal will talk to Underhill LJ and get him to see sense. Maybe, the media will cover the story and the judges will change their mind. There is always the Supreme Court. And Lady Arden cares about the welfare of the Zambrano children.
Also, their (Underhill LJ and the Home Office) reliance on case law that involves European children and not British children shows they are struggling to prove their point.
Hopefully, you all got something from the posts. This forum is becoming a bit too negative for me so I will have to close the account. I just picked this up a couple of days ago, after a long time, and thought I would add my analysis. If you remember from last time, I am NOT one to just say my conclusions... I develop them, hence the references.
In closing, I will say that I think Zambrano carers will succeed at the Supreme Court, if it gets that far. Hopefully, all decisions will be put on hold and people will be able to live their lives normally in the interim period. Take care of yourselves.
Thank you for the kind words. The forum won't close. Just my account. I am not an admin and have no say over this forum whatsoever.
I am leaving because I really am quite busy these days, and try to stay away from unhealthy situations....Anyway, well done on all your efforts and research! You certainly are a credit to British society. I am sure you will be successful, one way or another. Take care.