- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
Thre is no other workaround. The caseworker will need to verify the information and they WILL contact the employer. Many of us do face the same issue, but guess there wouldn't any severe consequences as you have stated. In my case, I have given the contact details of the payroll department and not the HR. I'm quite sure that the payroll doesn't get silly enough to report this to my reporting manager, espescially in a company that employs 55000 people.aussie123 wrote: (1) How does one approach this issue or work around this – it would appear to be a mandatory requirement? Why isn’t this an issue for others applying under this category – how are others dealing with this? Do you have to use payslips and/or a letter from your employer?
(2) Is superannuation counted as part of your earnings? This is shown on payslips but isn’t shown on my bank account statements as this is paid into a super fund. Do we have to provide two pieces of evidence for every component of our earnings?
(3) Providing bank account statements. Bank account statements will only show after tax earnings and will not show superannuation as well. If you can provide a tax return or payslips (alternative evidence) which show the before tax earnings and what other components were taken out before it was paid to the account, will the officer take the trouble (or be bright enough) to come to the understanding that the bank account payments don’t reflect total past earnings?
jack_p wrote: As you have stated, its better to produce two sets of evidence to be on the safer side.
Does the Gross Salary amount as shown on your Salary Slip includes Superannuation? I think it would be.The super component is shown on the payslip
First of all the HO doesn't check all applications with employment verification. If your documentation is good, then there isn't any need for them to call the employer to verify it.aussie123 wrote:Thanks that is some very useful advice. If anyone else out there can also tell me of their experience (or suggestions) on the issue of using a current employer for salary verification that would also be helpful. Maybe if the boss becomes aware of it you just have to be fank and say I might be off to the UK in the future (maybe they might start being a bit nicer to me )
My company uses electronic payslips. Can I simply print these out on company letter head (with the company logo) on it? Is this acceptable?
I do believe Superannuation is taxed in Australia, but it is paid directly into a managed superannuation fund (or mutual fund I think it is called in the US). They are not like normal bank accounts. The super component is shown on the payslip. But to provide the second piece of evidence for the super annuation, I could probably get the super fund company to send me the transactions on the account showing the additions with each pay to it - would this suffice?
Thanks in advance....
First - just on that supposition one can not "not worry" about the potential contact for verification. If the evidence provided is credible (to be judged by the case worker) the probability of verification checks is low (but not zero)republique wrote:First of all the HO doesn't check all applications with employment verification. If your documentation is good, then there isn't any need for them to call the employer to verify it.aussie123 wrote:Thanks that is some very useful advice. If anyone else out there can also tell me of their experience (or suggestions) on the issue of using a current employer for salary verification that would also be helpful. Maybe if the boss becomes aware of it you just have to be fank and say I might be off to the UK in the future (maybe they might start being a bit nicer to me )
My company uses electronic payslips. Can I simply print these out on company letter head (with the company logo) on it? Is this acceptable?
I do believe Superannuation is taxed in Australia, but it is paid directly into a managed superannuation fund (or mutual fund I think it is called in the US). They are not like normal bank accounts. The super component is shown on the payslip. But to provide the second piece of evidence for the super annuation, I could probably get the super fund company to send me the transactions on the account showing the additions with each pay to it - would this suffice?
Thanks in advance....
Second, the HO is not so naive to call employers stating checking up on your employee's details so he can stop working for you.
Third, Employment verification is done for numerous reasons-credit checks for rentals or property purchases, not just for change of employment so to be so paranoid, that the HO makes employment verfication.
Is it Ok to give the details of my reporting Regional Manger (he is under VP) and my manager knows all my details likepush_hsmp wrote: I think the applicant will be better off disclosing it to his boss and providing his contacts in the application.
Is it Ok to give the details of my reporting Regional Manger (he is under VP) and my manager knows all my details likepush_hsmp wrote: I think the applicant will be better off disclosing it to his boss and providing his contacts in the application.
Notvn_ramesh wrote:Guys..
Any Suggestions on the below query??
Will highly appreciate it...
Thanks again
keep n u will be OK soon...No
Evidently I am paranoid