I called the HSMP team on Monday, April 25, and was advised my application had been processed and approved the same day. I am awaiting the official documents. Here are some details:
Reference number: 0256xx
Application sent: September 1, 2004, out of country (FedEx)
Received by HSMP: September 2, 2004
Extra details sent: February 16, 2005 (these weren't requested, I sent them to strengthen my application)
Request for urgent treatment: Faxed and e-mailed April 12, 2005
Approval notified by phone (I called them): April 25, 2005
About me: I work in newspaper and new media publishing, and have international experience and recognition under my belt.
Once I receive the documents, I will try to post more about where I scored points and where I didn't. In the meantime, some general points:
* I was meticulous in my application, studying the guidance notes in-depth, any FAQs I could find on the IND website, plus the caseworker notes, and supplying all original documentation. I put all these attachments in a folder, divided into sections according to the relevant section of the application form.
* Where I had received and followed e-mail advice from HSMP on the application process, I included print-outs of these e-mails and referred to them in the application. I also quoted the guidance notes/FAQs/guidelines where relevant.
* On my request for urgent treatment, I simply pointed out that the months ahead are the best time for me to find work in my field, and the length of time my application was in the queue. But at this stage I don't know whether they acted on my urgency request or my turn just came up.
* I MAINTAINED A POLITE TONE in all my communications. This is very important. I know that histrionics and in-your-face emotive behaviour get results in countries where some applicants come from, but it won't wash in Britain. If I were the caseworker I'd be thinking: "Is a person who behaves like this going to be able to adapt culturally, function in a team, make a valuable contribution to our economy" etc.
* When requesting duty statements from my former employers I provided a list of duties and a suggested form of words. I think this is important because your boss/former boss won't have studied the HSMP guidelines and therefore won't have an inkling of just how much detail is required.
* HSMP are now saying they might NOT request extra documents if your application falls short. If you have extra docs, send them before they're asked for, maybe forewarning by e-mail or fax that they are coming.
* I sent my extra documents by registered mail that was supposed to include "advice of receipt" (an AR card) coming back to me. It didn't, so I followed up by phoning Royal Mail and they were able to trace the reference number my postal service gave me. This CANNOT be done using the publicly available tracing service on the Royal Mail website. But Royal Mail could not provide written confirmation, so I also complained to my local postal service and they are following it up. I think getting confirmation of delivery is VITAL because you may need it if HSMP claim they didn't receive documents.
* I DID NOT send a statement of my finances or an estimate of living expenses, having been advised by e-mail that this was not needed. I sent a print-out of this advisory e-mail with my extra documents. But I can't vouch for everyone getting the same advice and every caseworker taking the same attitude.
W.
- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222