Let's analyse the changes, and apologies in advance if this is going to get a bit technical.
Para 6A of the Immigration Rules currently reads :-
-: and that is being changed to :-6A. For the purpose of these Rules, a person is not to be regarded as having (or potentially having) recourse to public funds merely because he is (or will be) reliant in whole or in part on public funds provided to his sponsor, unless, as a result of his presence in the United Kingdom, the sponsor is (or would be) entitled to increased or additional public funds.
So we are introduced to P, who is the visa applicant. Their sponsor is also mentioned. The main difference is that there is now a part in brackets .... "(save where such entitlement to increased or additional public funds is by virtue of P and the sponsor’s joint entitlement to benefits under the regulations referred to in paragraph 6B)" .... and actually I think that is mere confirmation of the existing situation, as regards a joint claim to Tax Credits. The existing para 6B effectively takes precedence over the existing para 6A .... and in the new para 6A we get confirmation that is the case.6A. for the purpose of these rules, a person (P) is not to be regarded as having (or potentially having) recourse to public funds merely because P is (or will be) reliant in whole or in part on public funds provided to P’s sponsor unless, as a result of P’s presence in the United Kingdom, the sponsor is (or would be) entitled to increased or additional public funds (save where such entitlement to increased or additional public funds is by virtue of P and the sponsor’s joint entitlement to benefits under the regulations referred to in paragraph 6B).
So the changes to para 6A are nothing to be concerned about. Let's turn to para 6B. The existing version reads :-
-: and from 31.03.09 that is changed to :-6B. A person shall not be regarded as having recourse to public funds if he is a person who is not excluded from specified benefits under section 115 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 by virtue of regulations made under sub-sections (3) and (4) of that section or section 42 of the Tax Credits Act 2002.
-: to which I say, yes we need to consider the new para 6C, but apart from that the only other change is that again P is mentioned.6B. subject to paragraph 6C, a person (P) shall not be regarded as having recourse to public funds if P is entitled to benefits specified under section 115 of the immigration and asylum act 1999 by virtue of regulations made under sub-sections (3) and (4) of that section or section 42 of the Tax Credits act 2002.
So we need to look at the new para 6C. This does not exist in the existing Immigration Rules, but as from 31.03.09 it reads :-
The first thing to note is that para 6C only affects those "making an application from outside the United Kingdom". So let's just stop there for a moment. Because of what we have already concluded about the new 6A and 6B, for those making visa applications in the UK there is really no difference to the current situation. That is, P is introduced to us, and there is a bit of confirmation about something we knew anyway, but in reality for those making applications in the UK there is no difference at all. Good news!6C. a person (P) making an application from outside the United Kingdom will be regarded as having recourse to public funds where P relies upon the future entitlement to any public funds that would be payable to P or to P’s sponsor as a result of P’s presence in the United Kingdom, (including those benefits to which P or the sponsor would be entitled as a result of P’s presence in the United Kingdom under the regulations referred to in to paragraph 6B).
So returning to para 6C, and only for those applying outside the UK, we are faced with working out what "where P relies upon the future entitlement" actually means. I think it comes down to this. Because of the way the current 6B is worded, it could currently be argued by the applicant that any benefit claims OK because of 6B can be taken into account in working out whether the financial test is passed, or not.
Example .... say the application is for a spouse visa .... and if that is granted .... when the successful applicant arrives in the UK there will be an increased ability to claim Tax Credits .... and the applicant needs to take that increased income into account in order to pass the financial test, then now because of the new 6C, which is mentioned at the beginning of 6B, such extra Tax Credits cannot be taken into account in working out whether the financial test is passed.
The conclusion is thus that where the sponsor has low income then it might be even more difficult than before to pass the financial test.
However if the visa granted, and then the person comes to the UK, there is nothing to stop that enhanced claim for Tax Credits to be made. That is, I think the extent of 6C is merely in determining whether the visa should be granted, and thereafter it effectively has no effect. That is, it does not stop that Tax Credits claim being made; it merely stops such enhanced benefit being taken into account is assessing the success or not of the visa application.
As said above, this is very technical, and if anyone else has any comments I shall be delighted to read them.