- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
f2k wrote:Yes Papafaith should be jumping up and down. It has been a struggle but thanks to those who have kept the faith.Chess wrote:Do you think HO will give a refund to those who had to pay for the extra year...
I think HO may drag its feet to such a date when all the eligible people would have reached their 5 years!
But the ruling does set a precedence vis a vis the earned citizenship stuff - no more retrospective application of rules!![]()
Where is Papafaith - I assume you are laughing all the way to Croydon![]()
![]()
![]()
with regards to fees
80. It was made clear during the hearing, as I have already stated, that the Secretary of State accepts that it is necessary to deal with the individuals who were members of the scheme before April 2006. She accepts too that no individuals should be disadvantaged in relation to being removed from the UK and in relation to being asked to pay an additional fee. However, in my judgment, the proposed policy referred to in the letter of 19 February 2009 does not go far enough, for the reasons I have given.
81. My provisional view is that the Claimant is entitled to the relief sought, but I shall invite submissions from counsel as to the appropriate relief in this case before deciding on the form of the Order.