- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
and not asIf the applicant wishes to submit electronic bank statements from an online account these must contain all of the details listed above. In addition, the applicant will need to provide a supporting letter from his/her bank, on company headed paper, confirming the authenticity of the statements provided.
You have a strong case for review. Hope the prinouts contained all the information as listed out in 204 i) of the guidance notes.Alternatively an electronic bank statement bearing the official stamp of the bank in question will be accepted. This stamp should appear on every page of the statement.
Adding on to this - When I applied for TIER 1 general, I had my statements printed by Natwest in branch. It prints their logo and registered address for the bank. Now this is not on official letter head paper, however was stamped by my bank (showing branch sort code, address) and signed by Customer Advisor with his name. As suggested by push_hsmp, you have a case for review. HO acts stupid in a way, they have the authority to request a "Status Check" from all banks in such cases. Two of my sisters work in Natwest and barclays respectively and they get these type of req from HO every now and thenpush_hsmp wrote:Looks like it got treated as :and not asIf the applicant wishes to submit electronic bank statements from an online account these must contain all of the details listed above. In addition, the applicant will need to provide a supporting letter from his/her bank, on company headed paper, confirming the authenticity of the statements provided.You have a strong case for review. Hope the prinouts contained all the information as listed out in 204 i) of the guidance notes.Alternatively an electronic bank statement bearing the official stamp of the bank in question will be accepted. This stamp should appear on every page of the statement.
Can you post the exact wording of refusal?
You can appeal as all you need is a stamped electronic statement as per the guidance notes (Quoted in my earlier post). Go for it and you would not have any problems.getbharath wrote:Hello Members,
Firstly thanks for your reply and kinda moral support. I am happy to see your message.
@push_hsmp
The exact wording of refusal is
"ING vysya xxx180 bank statement enclosed.Not considered this evidence ,as it is an internet bank statement with no supporting letter from the bank as per the requirements of published guidence."
Please let me know the chances of my admin review success! I shall be greatful to your kind response.
Bharath.
They say Admin review is quite quick and mostly completed in 30 days. I will have to double check thoughgetbharath wrote:Hello Push_hsmp,
Can you please let me know the approximate time the BHC would take to review and process my application on admin review.
I applied at bangalore VFS office and the Chennai BHC refused my entry clearance.
I hope you are not confusing it with appeals process.What is Administrative Review?
If we refuse an application for entry clearance and you think that an error has been made, you can ask us to check our decision. This is known as an Administrative Review.
The Administrative Review is free of charge. You must ask for an Administrative Review within 28 days from the date you receive the refusal notice (GV51). You will receive the following documents with the Refusal Notice:
Administrative Review Request Notice
PBS Administrative Review Request Notice guidance notes
You must complete this in full and send it directly to the address stated on the Request Notice.
You must not send any additional documents such as passport/travel document or supporting documents with the Administrative Review Request Notice. If the refusal is subsequently overturned, you will be asked to send in your passport/travel document. You may request only one Administrative Review per refusal decision. Any further review requests for the same refusal decision will not be accepted and will be returned to you.
The Administrative Review will be completed within 28 days and you will be notified of the result in writing. The result of the Review may be sent from a different Post to where the original decision was made, to ensure that the Review is independent.
Well it seems to vary. Look at the following links which indicate a resolution with 1 month to 3 months/6 monthsgetbharath wrote:@Push_hsmp,
Thanks a lot for your moral support. I shall further proceed with the admin review.
As per your message please update me on the time lines. I shall wait to hear from you.
Thanks once again.
Best Regards,
Bharath.
Thats fine. If I were in your situation I would copy and paste exact text from the guidance note to say something like following in the cover letter:twister wrote:Guys.
Almost the same question as Bharat. So will butt in. If the statement printed on white paper (printed + stamped + signed by bank official), and has the info listed above EXCEPT the logo.
Is that acceptable for Previous Earnings?
Thanks.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I was otherwise granted points as claimed for other criteria."ING vysya xxx180 bank statement enclosed. Not considered this evidence, as it is an internet bank statement with no supporting letter from the bank as per the requirements of published guidance."
In addition, as the Bank provided electronic bank statements, I got the same stamped (& signed) by the Bank as per the highlighted guidance note below (para xxx, page xxx of PBS Tier-1 General.....)The personal bank or building society statements should clearly show:
 your name;
 the account number;
 the date of the statement;
 the financial institution's name and logo;
 transactions covering the three-month period;
 that there is enough funds present in the account; and
 that there has been enough money present in the account for the past three months.
It is clear from the above that if an applicant provides electronic bank statements which are stamped by the bank, he is not required to provide a supporting letter from the bank. Apparently, the case worker did not consider the evidence in line with the aforementioned guidance note and rejected my application in error.If you wish to send electronic bank statements from an online account these must contain all of the details listed above. In addition, you will need to send a supporting letter from your bank, on headed paper, confirming that the statements are genuine. Alternatively, electronic bank statements with the official stamp of the bank that issued the statements will be accepted. The stamp must appear on every page of the statement.
Well you have already sent it so chill. I just felt that your letter did not clearly bring out the issue as to why should the application not have been rejected in the first place (it certainly did not highlight the fact that it is not absolutely essential to provide letter from the bank). Anyways, I assume the consultant would have been handling such issues regularly and must have drafted the response based on his experience.getbharath wrote:Hayyo......The format is excellent.
I should've got this earlier, I would've sent it by myself.
Now the covering letter and appendix form has been sent from my consultant to the BHC,chennai.
Push_hsmp now can you please confirm me if there is some problem in the covering letter posted to you earlier.
Can I send once more with the format sent by you. WOuld that be a problem?
Best regards,
Bharath.
This seems a generic reply. You should (rather your representative) should write to them asking if they could confirm receit of your AR request and if so what might be the timelines.getbharath wrote: I wrote a mail to them stating that so and so consultant would represet me . But the response was ................
" Dear sir,
If you wish to apply for admin review, please fax your request form to ....."
What does this confirm? haven't they received my request fax from my consultant?
Please reply!
Best Regards,
Bharath.
There seems to be something wrong with the transmission of fax. You can re-send the form referring to their call and repeated and yet unsuccessful attempts of your representative in doing so. Tell them that you are sending the duplicate form as you have been intimated on your mobile+your representative has been advised on email that the documents have not been received by BHC Chennai. Also advise them that incomplete/duplicate review requests they might have received may kindly be discarded.getbharath wrote:Hi PUSH_HSMP,
This is another doubt now. Please help me.
The exact status of my admin review process:::::
My representative from UK had faxed he BHC,chennai and I sent a representation letter containing your letter that was mailed here (FORUM) earlier.
The BHC called me over my mobile last thursday and told me that they received only my letter not any appendix forms from my consultant.
But when I checked with my consultatnt, he said he had already mailed 3 times and there was absolutely no problem with their fax.
Then he also told me that he too received a mail from the BHC , chennai stating that they (BHC) didn't receive any AR forms .
So he faxed them again for the 4th time and when I queried him about its status he says he assumes it would've gone smooth.
BUt I am still not sure. So can I send the AR forms from my end too. Will there be any problem if both of us send to BHC. Any chance will they reject the admin review process.
Please answer to the above doubt which would be of gr8 help to us!
Bharath.