LETTER DOES NOT STATE FUNDS ARE READILY AVAILABLE! HELP

[9603196090]

My entry is refused for first time since my bank letter does not state that
THE FUNDS IN MY ACCOUNT ARE READILY AVAILABLE.
Now am planning to make a FRESH APPLICATION with a NEW LETTER.

Please read/review my NEW BANK LETTER and reply accordingly
Dear Sir,

this is to certify that Mr.xxxxxxAccount No.xxxxx, currently holds a total of Rs.2.5Lacs and we confirm that these funds have been in

bank since 13/02/09. The funds did not fall below Rs. 2.5 Lacs at any time during the last three months. The above FDR is

ENCASHABLE Immediately on demand by the depositor.

Yours Faithfully

signature and stamp of the manager with office seal

Note: Rs. 2.5 lacs are approx. 3100GBP(this is not there on letter)
BHC will convert the amount in GBP at the time of making decision.

Is this a right letter or I should still tell my bank to write that the funds are READILY AVAILABLE. Could anyone advice????

Can I put this letter as an explainotory note with THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW form which I got with refusal notice??will it be

worth???or fresh application is best for me???
I would really appreciate any suggestions
Thanks in advance

[dahokolomoki]

Your document already has the following:

The above FDR is ENCASHABLE Immediately on demand by the depositor.

Which I take to mean readily available? I think in a court of appeal that will hold up as meaning "readily available".

[koolbone]

Your document already has the following:

The above FDR is ENCASHABLE Immediately on demand by the depositor.

Which I take to mean readily available? I think in a court of appeal that will hold up as meaning "readily available".

I concur.

[9603196090]

@dahokolomoki

Dear dahakolomoki

Do you mean my letter is okie???

can I submit THIS LETTER Letter stating:

THE ABOVE FDR IS ENCASHABLE IMMEDIATLY ON DEMAND BY THE DEPOSITOR[/b

WHAT DO YOU MEAN WHEN YOU SAY:

Which I take to mean readily available? I think in a court of appeal that will hold up as meaning "readily available

COULD YOU MAKE IT MORE CLEAR .THANKS

[yasa]

My entry is refused for first time since my bank letter does not state that
THE FUNDS IN MY ACCOUNT ARE READILY AVAILABLE.
Now am planning to make a FRESH APPLICATION with a NEW LETTER.

Please read/review my NEW BANK LETTER and reply accordingly
Dear Sir,

this is to certify that Mr.xxxxxxAccount No.xxxxx, currently holds a total of Rs.2.5Lacs and we confirm that these funds have been in

bank since 13/02/09. The funds did not fall below Rs. 2.5 Lacs at any time during the last three months. The above FDR is

ENCASHABLE Immediately on demand by the depositor.

Yours Faithfully

signature and stamp of the manager with office seal

Note: Rs. 2.5 lacs are approx. 3100GBP(this is not there on letter)
BHC will convert the amount in GBP at the time of making decision.

Is this a right letter or I should still tell my bank to write that the funds are READILY AVAILABLE. Could anyone advice????

Can I put this letter as an explainotory note with THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW form which I got with refusal notice??will it be

worth???or fresh application is best for me???
I would really appreciate any suggestions
Thanks in advance

Letter looks fine to me..

[koolbone]

Dude, your letter is OK. Just different wordings which mean the same thing.