- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Very risky. If HO figures out that she is not studying, they can very well pick her up and deport her. Thats nice that you have kept her off benefits since she is not allowed to avail herself of them.frisbee wrote:thanks Wanderer
hmmm,
yes she's been working full time since she had to drop out of university coming up to two years ago, but still has paperwork from the university that has allowed her in and out of the country.
My research did suggest that if I get married my benefits get slashed to nothing but have not managed to clarify that. All a bit of a mess.
I've kept her out of the benefits world as we are independent financially and still broke. If married would the benefits people know if you didn't tell them?
Desperate times... at the moment the plan seems to be forming that she'll become an illegal imigrant by default as she has no money for a plane to canada nor anywhere in canada to stay nor people to see.
The only thing my research has suggested is leaving and coming back on a two year working tourist visa or something, which may be time to look into other options.
She may get away with not studying. However, working full time presents a major problem. Moreover, it could be argued that her student visa should have been cancelled due to her change of circumstances if she re-entered the UK within the past two years, when she was no longer studying and working full time (part 9).frisbee wrote: yes she's been working full time since she had to drop out of university coming up to two years ago, but still has paperwork from the university that has allowed her in and out of the country.
The constructive advice is to show you how the HO will see it.frisbee wrote:republique, ...great stuff there...
Maybe you've spent too long reading about visas that you can't see the human side. I'd have thought people on a visa advice forum would be trying to avoid being part of the machinery. When I say I've kept her out of the benefits, obviously this is not because she can claim, but rather to keep the state out our business where it has no place. If you're on the run from arranged marriages and such, the technicalities of migration laws fade into the background. Let's see if we can stick to constructive advice shall we?
Or none at all.
There is no 'working tourist visa' I'm afraid, only tourist - no work allowed. She'd be refused anyway given her immigration history.frisbee wrote:I suppose I'm not used to reading this minimal writing style, apologies where necessary. The arranged marriage issues and other things are just unpleasant family rather than danger, not enough to be an assylum seeker.
We're starting to accept the lack of options and she is going to go back to canada for a while and return on a working tourist visa after a few months.
Are the current visa violations able to affect that idea? Hopefully this way it's possible to clean the slate and then do the marriage idea afterwards sometime.
Anyway, thanks for all the advice.
That would be the YMS, open to Canadians between 18 and 31 and with £1600 in maintenance funds.frisbee wrote:i talked to canadians yesterday on the visa I speak of, maybe I got the name wrong but you can come and travel and work, and you can work the whole of the two years as recently changed. Why would her immigration history effect this? Everyone has been quite happy for her to be popping in and out of the country...