- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
Obie wrote:Apologies for the delayed response, which was due to circumstance beyond my control.sunshine11 wrote:
Hi guys
If you hire a top solicitor then please make sure you hire Asian guy. The reason I say this because English person will not help you (already seen in test case). At least our Asian person now
Danish in response to your message, if we were to take out the Asian bit of Sunshine11's statement and replace it with Caucasian, i am sure it will not be very nice , would it? there will be a huge outcry and complains of beloved, wouldn't there?
I am a non-Caucasian person, and don't believe in beloved, and think beloved by any ethnicity towards another is unacceptable.
This wasn't about language barrier, it was about the colour of one's skin.
If you had the opportunity of seeing some of the deleted statement of the individual in question, you would realise there was a attempt to solicit a criminal act or an underlying criminal agenda. However , i will try and refrain myself from mentioning it.
I wasn't speaking for the Administrator, as he is perfectly capable of doing so himself. I was speaking for myself incidentally.
I think a dearly beloved statement from whatever camp or ethnicity is unacceptable. He was unable to provide any prove, for his remarks, neither does his statement has any veracity.
Now let us look at the implication of CCL on prospective student like , a relative of mine, who is finding it extremely hard to secure a UK student visa .
It is public knowledge that CCL is a charade, and the students of this institution are perfectly aware of this. They know the score very well. I found it quite astounding that students of such calibre could not have know about this. Records of student could not be tallied with that of Home Office record. Lack of student identification, no records of lecturer and all the rest of it. It puts a distinctive dent on the character of all the student of this institution.
To think that this matter should be up for discussion is inconceivable.
It is colleges like CCL, and its students that gives poor hard working student in the UK a bad name, and helps right wing element in the political fraternity and far right parties to thrive.
at least update is we group of CCL going to high court let see what happen this time even we try all CCL victim come in this grouppicolla wrote:Guys,
we had enough discussion about the situation. Lots of fight, rumours and blame game. It's been one year.
Enough is enough.
Just let us know about recent updates if any.
Thanks.
hi guysrizoo wrote:at least update is we group of CCL going to high court let see what happen this time even we try all CCL victim come in this grouppicolla wrote:Guys,
we had enough discussion about the situation. Lots of fight, rumours and blame game. It's been one year.
Enough is enough.
Just let us know about recent updates if any.
Thanks.
Thanks
John wrote:jazam, all you can do is appeal, but be prepared for quite a fight from UKBA.
In particular, be prepared to prove that you were a genuine student at CCL.That is, that you didn't breach the terms of your previous student visa.
Hi GuysHitmaN2009 wrote:To all CCL victims,
I have been following this forum for the last 8 months now. Just a quick update. As Rizoo said before we are gathering all the victims of CCL & appealing in High Court against the decision of AIT. Although many of you have already received letters from AIT notifying the dismissal of appeal & to proceed with written representations if not satisfied.
So far we have about 50 - 60 students. We had our 4th meeting today & we are appealing in High Court by the end of this week possibly thursday. We are sharing all expenses collectively. My request to all CCL victims if you want to unite with us & proceed to high court then contact us immediately as we dont have much time left. Any suggestions & recommendations are welcome & whatever questions, issues you have can be raised up in the next meeting. This is a sensitive topic so we are not disclosing any more details on the forum. If you have any queries please contact me or Rizoo.
Thanks to Rizoo & Geoatleo & other people who are helping us to unite against the decision of AIT.
The reason I didnt posted it on the forum before is there are too many people out there who are just making fun of CCL victim's misery & manipulating information. There are reporters & all sorts of people reading these forums so we need to get together & come to a unanimous decision thats best in our interests. majority of CCL students were fake but the blame goes on home office as well for allowing CCL to be in the list of registered colleges capable of issuing PGD's.
If anyone wants to be part of our team & proceed to the high court regardless if they have received or replied back to the AIT regarding the "Written representation" letter please contact me or Rizoo. If you are living outside London even then you can join us.
Best regards,
Hitman
It is good that it proves you are currently a genuine student. However it does not assist as regards the allegation of deception, and of course it does nothing to prove that you were actually a genuine student at CCL, that is, a person who studied there.jazam wrote:Thnx for reply John. My solicitor sent my case for reconsideration on the basis of my results of first semester and assignments and conditional offer letter form CCL... Wht do u think of this idea of my solicitor ??
This message for John or other senior members, please can you advice me. One of my friend also victim of CCL and currently he is going through appeal procedure. He has British girl friend. He is planning to get married with her. He is with her last 3 years but not living together.John wrote:It is good that it proves you are currently a genuine student. However it does not assist as regards the allegation of deception, and of course it does nothing to prove that you were actually a genuine student at CCL, that is, a person who studied there.jazam wrote:Thnx for reply John. My solicitor sent my case for reconsideration on the basis of my results of first semester and assignments and conditional offer letter form CCL... Wht do u think of this idea of my solicitor ??
This message for John or other senior members, please can you advice me. One of my friend also victim of CCL and currently he is going through appeal procedure. He has British girl friend. He is planning to get married with her. He is with her last 3 years but not living together.John wrote:It is good that it proves you are currently a genuine student. However it does not assist as regards the allegation of deception, and of course it does nothing to prove that you were actually a genuine student at CCL, that is, a person who studied there.jazam wrote:Thnx for reply John. My solicitor sent my case for reconsideration on the basis of my results of first semester and assignments and conditional offer letter form CCL... Wht do u think of this idea of my solicitor ??
No, and furthermore, the issue of possible deception disappears, as regards an application for a spouse visa.Would the approval of a FLR(M) application not be subjected to a positive outcome from the appeal?
[b] Switching Category[/b] wrote:
your marriage or civil partnership did not take place after a decision was
made to deport or remove you from the United Kingdom;
Thanks very much for your responses; I am not much aware about Law. What you think, is it better to marry in Uk or outside the UK??Obie wrote:Sorry John, but this is the area that was coming to my mind.
[b] Switching Category[/b] wrote:
your marriage or civil partnership did not take place after a decision was
made to deport or remove you from the United Kingdom;
Based on you response, there is no legal basis to it , is there?
Can they not challenge that the original leave could have been obtained by deception, and hence these parties cannot benefit from in country application.
I understand that yes, they will benefit from Paragraph 320(7C) of the immigration rules.
OK, but isn't the point this. If the appeal has not yet been determined, there has been no decision "made to deport or remove you from the United Kingdom".Obie wrote:Sorry John, but this is the area that was coming to my mind.
Switching Category wrote:
your marriage or civil partnership did not take place after a decision was
made to deport or remove you from the United Kingdom;
Based on you response, there is no legal basis to it , is there?
The application for the spouse visa, and its granting, will supercede the student visa appeal. That is, should appeal will no longer happen. Assuming the appeal not determined, he is perfectly entitled to apply for the spouse visa in the UK.Summer_field wrote:What you think, is it better to marry in Uk or outside the UK??
If appeal will failed and he have to leave this country then is CCL will effect on his spouse Visa?
If he marry in UK I think still he have to back to his country to get suppose visa or he can apply for Visa in UK?
Any recommendation?.... John and other seniors please?tuhadda_fuffar wrote:Hi Guys,
My wife's passport has been kept by HO after CCL allegation and our case is in court, still without any hearing.
Could someone tell me please if we can get her passport back without taking back our appeal?
Actually we want to travel for our honeymoon and can’t travel without passport!!! You can also tell me if we could travel out of the UK at all at first place?
Thanks.