ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

How do we close information gap between Dublin and Brussels?

Forum to discuss all things Blarney | Ireland immigration

Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator

Locked
Southern_Sky
Member
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: Irska

How do we close information gap between Dublin and Brussels?

Post by Southern_Sky » Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:07 pm

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/wor ... 38228.html

A prime example of this EU information gap occurred last week when EU justice ministers met in Brussels to discuss a range of issues, including the controversial Metock immigration case. The plaintiffs were four couples living in Ireland, who successfully challenged deportation orders issued by the Government at the European Court of Justice (ECJ). Each couple included an EU national, who was not Irish, and a non-EU national, who had claimed asylum in Ireland. In a landmark judgment in 2006 the ECJ ruled that the Government had broken EU law by introducing restrictions on the rights of non-EU spouses to reside in the Republic.

The Lisbon Treaty will help by forcing the council to televise all debates when new legislation is being decided, although sensitive discussions such as Metock would still be held behind closed doors. It would also give MEPs a say over new legislation in the justice area for the first time, which should improve the level of scrutiny over such EU decisions.

The Lisbon Treaty also forces the European Commission to send all new legislative proposals to national parliaments for consideration in an attempt to bridge the gulf between domestic politics and EU politics. Parliaments can attempt to delay or block a proposal if they feel it infringes on an area that would best be handled through domestic rather than European legislation. This would address concerns raised by no campaigners about a “democratic deficitâ€

ca.funke
Moderator
Posts: 1414
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 11:05 am
Location: Zürich, CH (Schengen)
Belgium

Post by ca.funke » Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:54 pm

[quote="The Irish Times"]...The ECJ ruling was hugely controversial as the Government claimed it undermined a central plank of its immigration policy – tackling “sham marriagesâ€

mktsoi
Member of Standing
Posts: 322
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 8:27 pm

Post by mktsoi » Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:08 am

[quote="ca.funke"][quote="The Irish Times"]...The ECJ ruling was hugely controversial as the Government claimed it undermined a central plank of its immigration policy – tackling “sham marriagesâ€

Locked