- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
I mean't no adverse inference as to your character/s or such but appreciate you understanding of my comments. I appreciate the excitement of a successful visa application especially one enabling loved ones to be together.MunneRaja wrote:I agree this seems implausible but I just did not notice this. I did not imagine that they can make such a mistake.
Last Sunday, We were planning to send her passport for provisional driving license and thats when I noticed this.
I guess, I was just so happy after she got the visa in India that I forgot to check the visa duration
Dependents if included in the principal applicant's form do not need to pay a separate fee. The catch however is that the dependents be on the correct 'dependent visa' in line with the principal applicant's visa that is being extended - hence why this may be a problem at HSMP extension stage because the spouse and principal applicant's visa are of different categories based on timeline rather than annotation...the former takes precedence. OP could always ask for a concession for his spouse. That a visa is held to 2009 leads me to believe the HO will refuse the dependents extension.MunneRaja wrote:One more question, When I will apply for my HSMP extension in end of February, do I need to submit two forms (one for me and one for my wife) ? means do I need to pay £335 + £335 or just £335?
OP's HSMP visa is valid to April 2006. It follows that HSMP dependent spouse visa that was applied for should be annotated accordingly (it has) but to the same validity (it hasn't). This mismatch can have repurcussions in future FLR/ILR applications on a range of aspects from possible misrepresentation at entry to incorrect dependent LTR (see my comment on fees query by OP above). I have suggested a possible route for the OP to resolve this (now rather than stress at ILR stage) but it may very well cost. Hence my caveat 'for total peace of mind'. The OP is open to leaving things as they are until HSMP extension stage. For the sake of at max GBP 500 (for FLR O) I know which route I would take.ppron747 wrote:Just for information, Kayalami, could you explain why this is a problem? If I've read the thread correctly, OP is here on HSMP, and his wife's visa says "Accompanying HSMP Holder". The expiry date on his wife's visa is three and a half years later than OPs own LTR.
I can see that this would be a problem if the visa said "accompanying WP holder", because it would then appear to have been issued by virtue of a status that OP no longer has. Given that the visa has the correct "Accompanying HSMP Holder" endorsement on it, I'm genuinely puzzled.
Am I that scary - I always welcome queries/ comments...after all no man is a complete fountain of wisdom and as such I don't claim to know it all.ppron747 wrote:I'm not questioning your reply - I just don't understand!! Can you put me out of my misery?
Dont know about the beautiful mistake but bank statement was indeed healthy at that point of time. Alas, that was undone by wife's shopping.. thats why someone said "women does not come cheap".. lolflyez wrote:Maybe its just a beautiful mistake done by HO, or maybe their bank statement is quite healthy.
Only the HO dealing caseworker know what happen.
IMHO - I think you should not worry too much - the error was undertaken by the Embassy..MunneRaja wrote:Appreciate your concern Indian_in_uk.
I am also waiting for some more expert comments especially from Chess who asked for "the wording for the dependant visa".
Chess, your comments please..