- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Child cannot get ILR now.taliska wrote:Is the other parent a British citizen? If both are applying for settlement then it may be best just to wait and apply for the child to be registered as a British Citizen in march. If you apply now and both parents are on work permit you would have to apply for ILR for the child first then apply for naturalisation which is costly as would have to pay 2 fees.
No that is wrong, and in any case, British law cannot dictate what foreign nationality (if any) that child takes.The child would take the nationality of it's mother at birth if the mother is not on ILR or a BC so the child is not 'stateless'
Well not quite. After one or both parents has got their ILR, and no doubt the child gets their ILR at the same time, then the born-in-the-UK child can be Registered as British.when you apply for ILR you can apply for the child to be registered as a British Citizen in March.
You are confusing two issues, so what you say is liable to confuse. The place of the birth is factual, so we know whether or not the child was born in the UK. So once one or both parents get ILR then the born-in-the-UK child can be Registered as British.JAJ if a child is born in England to someone on a temporary visa the child cannot be registered as a British citizen
The Home Office has no say on whether a child is Indian or not. In any case, even if a UK born child is stateless, child does not have any entitlement to registration until the age of 5.taliska wrote:. I child who lives with their indian parents who are here on work permits would be considered as indian by the HO, not stateless or else a lot more people even on temporary work permits would have children who would be entitled to register as British.
Harshid I agree with you as I have gone through same stuff recently. Your child will be considered as Indian citizen regardless weather or not s/he has been registered with Indian authorities. When you apply for his/her citizenship you can write nationality as Indian. My nephew got BC through same way. WITHOUT any problem using from MN1.Harshid wrote:ust to let you know guys, the child is not an Indian citizen by descent unless his birth is registered at the Indian embassy with in one year of this birth.
Please see the following details which i found on ministry of home affairs website, Govt of India
"By Descent (section 4)
A person born outside India on or after 26th January 1950 but before 10th December 1992 is a citizen of India by descent, if his father was a citizen of India at the time of his birth. A person born outside India on or after 10th December 1992, is considered as a citizen of India if either of his parents is a citizen of India at the time of his birth. From 07th January 2004, a person born outside India shall not be a citizen of India by virtue of this Section, unless his birth is registered at an Indian consulate within one year of the date of birth or with the permission of the Central Government, after the expiry of the said period. An application, for registration of the birth of a minor child, to an Indian consulate under Section 4(1) shall be made in Form I and shall be accompanied by an undertaking in writing from the parents of such minor child that he or she does not hold the passport of another country."
_________________
I don't think so they do go in that much details. However, you can still confirm with HO over the phone to double check.Harshid wrote:Thanks Keshgrover,
but i find it difficult to digest that a child's present nationality would be classed as Indian without registering the childs at Indian emabssy, when the ministry of home affairs, Govt of India website says otherwise, especially for child born outside India after 7th Jan 2004..!
All i am trying to understand what's the proof/evidence to support the argument that the child is Indian, if i put him as Indian on the MN1 form
Can someone go in more detail on this one please.?
Many thanks.
JAJ wrote:Child's nationality (or lack thereof) is irrelevant for section 1(3). You could put down "None (probably eligible for Indian citizenship but not yet registered)"
What if the child was born in the UK to parents of different nationalities (Malawi and Jamaica) who were were not yet settled at the time the child was born? Parents now have ILR, but not married. Child does not have any passport. What would be the present nationality of the child for the purpose of section 1.9 on the MN1?John wrote:JAJ, that makes total sense to me. Harshid, I think you are concerned about something that is really not worth worrying about.
Well not just for the form MN1 ! Simply what is their nationality?What would be the present nationality of the child for the purpose of section 1.9 on the MN1?
Hi there!John wrote:Well not just for the form MN1 ! Simply what is their nationality?What would be the present nationality of the child for the purpose of section 1.9 on the MN1?
Needless to say I have no knowledge of the nationality laws of Malawi and Jamaica, but you need to check whether nationality of those countries has been inherited from the relevant parent.
However a quick look on the internet seems to confirm that the child has the citizenship of both Malawi and Jamaica, so if your own research confirms that, enter the names of those two countries in section 1.9 of the form MN1. It is not necessary to have a passport of a country in order to have its citizenship, so the lack of passport at the moment is irrelevant.